- Schwerpunkt
- Siegelgeber
- Gut zu wissen
Nachfolgend finden Sie eine Liste mit Dokumenten und Richtlinien, die bei der Erhebung der Standarddaten berücksichtigt wurden:
• Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard Version 4.1 • Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard Version 4.0 • Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard Version 3.1 • Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Restricted Substances • Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions • Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Content Limits • Version 4.1 Circularity Data Report & Cycling Instructions Template • Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Required Percentages of Cycled and Renewable Content by Product and Material Type • Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Water & Soil Stewardship Key Materials
Glaubwürdigkeit 82%
-
Verfügbarkeit der Organisationsstruktur
-
Unabhängigkeit des Systeminhabers vom Zertifikatsinhaber
-
Verfügbarkeit des Standards
-
Öffentliche Konsultation des Standards
-
Regelmäßige Revision des Standards
-
Rechtlicher Status
-
Finanzierungsquellen
-
Prozess der Standardsetzung
-
Bewertungsmethodik
-
Nachhaltigkeitsziele und Zielsetzung des Programms
-
Zentrale Themen
-
Feedback von Interessengruppen
-
Konsistente Auslegung des Standards
-
Zugänglichkeit des Systems
-
Beschwerde- und Einspruchsverfahren der Prüfstellen
-
Verfügbarkeit von Prüfberichten
-
Geltungsbereich und Gültigkeitsdauer des Zertifikats / der Lizenz
-
Zertifiziertes oder geprüftes Unternehmen / gelabelte Produktliste
Ab März 2025 wird das geforderte Anspruchsniveau für dieses Mindestkriterium von "basic" auf "advanced" erhöht.
-
Akkreditierte/ zugelassene Prüfstellen
-
Unabhängigkeit der Konformitätsbewertung
-
Konsistente Entscheidungsfindung bei Konformitätsbewertung
-
Verfahren bei Nicht-Konformität
-
Claims- und Kennzeichnungsrichtlinien
-
Systemmanagement
-
Governance
-
Stellt die standardsetzende Organisation ihre Organisationsstruktur, einschließlich der Zusammensetzung der Leitungsorgane, öffentlich zur Verfügung?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (0 Punkte)
- Ja, öffentlich (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
-
Handelt es sich bei der standardsetzenden Organisation um eine juristische Person, eine Organisation, die eine Partnerschaft von juristischen Personen ist, oder um eine staatliche oder zwischenstaatliche Einrichtung?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Gibt es einen Mechanismus für die Beteiligung von Interessengruppen an der Entwicklung des Standardsystems und der Entscheidungsfindung?
Mögliche Antworten
- Yes available publicly (2 Punkte)
- Yes available on request (1 Punkt)
- No (0 Punkte)
-
Stellen die Abstimmungsverfahren des obersten Entscheidungsgremiums eine ausgewogene Vertretung der Interessen der Beteiligten sicher, bei der kein Einzelinteresse überwiegt?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Stellt die standardsetzende Organisation quantitative Informationen über die Einkommensquellen oder die Finanzierungsstruktur des Systems zur Verfügung?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich (2 Punkte)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
-
Verfügt der Systeminhaber über ein internes Qualitätsmanagementsystem?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
-
Ist die standardsetzende Organisation wirtschaftlich unabhängig vom Zertifikatsinhaber?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Hat die standardsetzen-de Organisation nachhaltigkeitsorientierte Ziele und Vorgaben?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über eine Strategie zur Erreichung ihrer nachhaltigkeitsorientierten Ziele?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich (2 Punkte)
-
Stellt die standardsetzende Organisation ihre Organisationsstruktur, einschließlich der Zusammensetzung der Leitungsorgane, öffentlich zur Verfügung?
-
Wirkung
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über ein System zur Messung der Wirkung und Fortschritte bei der Erreichung ihrer Nachhaltigkeitsziele?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich (2 Punkte)
-
Nutzt die standardsetzende Organisation die Ergebnisse des Monitorings, um daraus zu lernen und ihr Programm zu verbessern?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Stellt der Systeminhaber die Nachhaltigkeitsergebnisse aus M&E zur Verfügung?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich (2 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über ein System zur Messung der Wirkung und Fortschritte bei der Erreichung ihrer Nachhaltigkeitsziele?
-
Beschwerdemechanismus
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über einen öffentlich und leicht zugänglichen Beschwerdemechanismus?
Mögliche Antworten
- No (0 Punkte)
- Yes (1 Punkt)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über einen öffentlich und leicht zugänglichen Beschwerdemechanismus?
-
Unterstützende Strategien
-
Werden im Rahmen des Programms Strategien oder Aktivitäten angeboten, um die Leistung der teilnehmenden Unternehmen zu verbessern, z. B. durch den Aufbau von Kapazitäten oder den Zugang zu Finanzmitteln?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
-
Werden im Rahmen des Programms Strategien oder Aktivitäten angeboten, um die Leistung der teilnehmenden Unternehmen zu verbessern, z. B. durch den Aufbau von Kapazitäten oder den Zugang zu Finanzmitteln?
-
Governance
-
Standardsetzung
-
Wird der Standard öffentlich und kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (0 Punkte)
- Ja, öffentlich (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
-
Wurden im Rahmen des Standardsetzungsprozesses wichtige Nachhaltigkeitsaspekte in dem Sektor, in dem das System tätig ist, oder im Produktlebenszyklus definiert?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Wird der Standardsetzungsprozess oder eine Zusammenfassung des Verfahrens, wie sich Interessengruppen an dem Standardsetzungsprozess beteiligen können, öffentlich zugänglich gemacht?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (0 Punkte)
- Ja, öffentlich (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
-
Können sich Interessenvertreter*innen am Standardsetzungsprozess beteiligen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Members only (1 Punkt)
- Invitation only (1 Punkt)
- All stakeholders (2 Punkte)
-
Haben die von dem Standard direkt betroffenen Interessengruppen die Möglichkeit, sich an dem Standardsetzungsprozess zu beteiligen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Werden Standardentwürfe im Rahmen des Entwicklungs- und Überarbeitungsprozesses auf ihre Relevanz und Überprüfbarkeit hin getestet/erprobt?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Legt die standardsetzende Organisation Informationen darüber vor, wie die Anregungen aus den Konsultationen in die endgültige Fassung des Standards eingeflossen sind?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich (2 Punkte)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
-
Stellen die Abstimmungsverfahren des für den Standardsetzungsprozess zuständigen Entscheidungsgremiums eine ausgewogene Vertretung der Interessen der Beteiligten sicher?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Wird der Standard mindestens alle 5 Jahre überprüft und ggf. überarbeitet?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Stellt das System sicher, dass Leitlinien vorhanden sind, die eine einheitliche Auslegung des Standards unterstützen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Gibt es Verfahren und Leitlinien für die Anwendung oder Auslegung des Standards in regionalen Kontexten?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Wird der Standard öffentlich und kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt?
-
Konformitätskontrolle
-
Konformitätskontrollsystem
-
Gibt es eine öffentlich zugängliche, dokumentierte Bewertungsmethodik, mit der die Konformität mit dem Standard bewertet werden kann?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja, verfügbar auf Anfrage (0 Punkte)
- Ja, öffentlich verfügbar (1 Punkt)
-
Können sich alle potenziellen Antragsteller innerhalb des Geltungsbereichs des Programms bewerben (um zertifiziert/geprüft zu werden)?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Stellt die standardsetzende Organisation Informationen über die Bewertungsgebühren zur Verfügung oder verlangt sie dies von den Prüfstellen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja, verfügbar auf Anfrage (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich verfügbar (2 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation von den Prüfstellen, dass sie über ein leicht zugängliches Beschwerde- und Einspruchsverfahren verfügen?
Mögliche Antworten
- No (0 Punkte)
- Yes available on request (1 Punkt)
- Yes publicly available (2 Punkte)
-
Stellt die standardsetzende Organisation eine Zusammenfassung der Zertifizierungs-/Verifizierungsberichte (ohne personenbezogene und wirtschaftlich sensible Informationen) zur Verfügung oder verlangt dies von den Prüfstellen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (keine Berichte) (0 Punkte)
- Nein (vertraulich) (1 Punkt)
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (2 Punkte)
- Ja, öffentlich (2 Punkte)
-
Legt das Zertifikat oder die Lizenz den Umfang der Konformitätsbewertung und die Gültigkeitsdauer fest?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Führt die standardsetzende Organisation eine öffentlich zugängliche Liste der zertifizierten oder geprüften Unternehmen oder eine Liste der geprüften Produkte/Produktgruppen oder eine Liste der Mitglieder (im Falle von mitgliedschaftsbasierten Initiativen) oder verlangt dies von Prüfstellen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Yes (1 Punkt)
- No (0 Punkte)
- Yes incl. scope of certificate or license (2 Punkte)
-
Führt die standardsetzende Organisation eine aktuelle und öffentlich zugängliche Liste aller akkreditierten/zugelassenen/suspendierten Konformitätsbewertungsstellen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (0 Punkte)
- Ja, öffentlich (1 Punkt)
-
Überprüft die standard-setzende Organisation regelmäßig die Wirksamkeit des Konformitätskontrollsystems?
Mögliche Antworten
- Annual (1 Punkt)
- Every 3 years (1 Punkt)
- Every 5 years (1 Punkt)
- Ad hoc (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass Kunden und andere betroffene Interessengruppen über Änderungen am Konformitätskontrollsystem informiert werden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation kontinuierliche Leistungsverbesserungen, um die Zertifizierung aufrechtzuerhalten?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über eine dokumentierte Bewertungsmethode für Prüfstellen, die die CoC bewerten?
Mögliche Antworten
- yes publicly available (2 Punkte)
- yes available on request (1 Punkt)
- No (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation von den Prüfstellen, dass sie über die eingegangenen Beschwerden und die zur Lösung des Problems getroffenen Maßnahmen Bericht erstatten?
Mögliche Antworten
- No (0 Punkte)
- Yes (1 Punkt)
-
Unterhält die standardsetzende Organisation ein Informationsmanagementsystem?
Mögliche Antworten
- No (0 Punkte)
- Yes (1 Punkt)
-
Hat die standardsetzende Organisation Gleichwertigkeitsanforderungen an die Ergebnisse anderer, von ihr anerkannten, Konformitätskontrollen festgelegt?
Mögliche Antworten
- Yes (1 Punkt)
- No (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Gibt es eine öffentlich zugängliche, dokumentierte Bewertungsmethodik, mit der die Konformität mit dem Standard bewertet werden kann?
-
Konformitätsbewertung
-
Konformitätsbewertungsverfahren
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation eine Konformitätsprüfung aller Kunden durch unabhängige Dritte, um die Einhaltung des Standards zu überprüfen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (2 Punkte)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
-
Legt die standardsetzende Organisation Leitlinien für die Entscheidungsfindung fest, um sicherzustellen, dass die Prüfstellen einheitliche Verfahren zur Konformitätsbewertung von Kun-den oder Laborergebnissen mit dem Standard anwenden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass die Prüfstellen über ein Verfahren verfügen, das regelt, wie die Kunden mit Nichtkonformitäten umzugehen haben, auch wenn ein Zertifikat oder eine Lizenz ausgesetzt oder widerrufen wird?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation eine Konformitätsprüfung aller Kunden durch unabhängige Dritte, um die Einhaltung des Standards zu überprüfen?
-
Nachhaltigkeitsprüfungen
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über ein dokumentiertes Aufsichtskonzept, das von den Prüfstellen verlangt, dass sie akkreditiert sind oder die Anforderungen der ISO/IEC 17065, ISO/IEC 17021, ISO/IEC 17020, ISO/IEC 17025 (für Laboratorien) erfüllen oder alternativ relevante Anforderungen des ISEAL Assurance Code erfüllen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass die Kunden regelmäßig und regelmäßig geprüft werden?
Mögliche Antworten
- 1 Jahr oder weniger (1 Punkt)
- 1-2 Jahre (1 Punkt)
- 2-3 Jahre (1 Punkt)
- 4-5 Jahre (1 Punkt)
- 5 Jahre oder mehr (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Beruht die Häufigkeit oder Intensität eines Audits oder einer Aufsichtsprüfung auf einer Risikobewertung des Kunden oder der Konformitätsbewertungsstelle?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Legt die standardsetzende Organisation die erforderliche Intensität für jede Art von Audit und die Tätigkeiten fest, die von den Prüfstellen für jeden Standard durchgeführt werden müssen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
-
Erlaubt oder verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass die Konformitätsbewertungsstellen unangekündigte Audits durchführen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Erlaubt (1 Punkt)
- Vorgeschrieben (2 Punkte)
- Nicht erlaubt (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Sind die Prüfer*innen verpflichtet, während des Audits- und Aufsichtsprüfprozesses den Beitrag externer Interessengruppen einzuholen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation von den Konformitätsbewertungsstellen, dass sie ein einheitliches Berichtsformat verwenden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass Prüfstellen und Aufsichtsstellen kompetentes und unparteiisches Personal (neben Prüfer*innen / Auditor*innen /Teams) einsetzen, um Entscheidungen über die Einhaltung der Vorschriften zu treffen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über ein dokumentiertes Aufsichtskonzept, das von den Prüfstellen verlangt, dass sie akkreditiert sind oder die Anforderungen der ISO/IEC 17065, ISO/IEC 17021, ISO/IEC 17020, ISO/IEC 17025 (für Laboratorien) erfüllen oder alternativ relevante Anforderungen des ISEAL Assurance Code erfüllen?
-
Gruppenzertifizierung
-
Muss die Gruppe über ein gemeinsames Verwaltungssystem mit klaren Zuständigkeiten für die Umsetzung des Systems verfügen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über einen Mechanismus, der vorschreibt und begründet, wie alle Standorte innerhalb einer Gruppenzertifizierung im Laufe der Zeit auditiert werden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Gibt es eine Formel für den Stichprobenumfang und ein Stichprobenverfahren, um die Anzahl der Gruppenmitglieder zu bestimmen, die extern überprüft wird, und wie die Stichprobe ausgewählt wird?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- ja, auf Grundlage einer Risikobewertung (2 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Sind in den Anforderungen an die Gruppenzerti-fizierung/-prüfung die Bedingungen festgelegt, unter denen ein Gruppenmitglied suspendiert oder aus einer Gruppe ausgeschlossen werden kann?
Mögliche Antworten
- Member suspended from certification (1 Punkt)
- Member removed from a group (1 Punkt)
- Group suspension (1 Punkt)
- No repercussion (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Muss die Gruppe über ein gemeinsames Verwaltungssystem mit klaren Zuständigkeiten für die Umsetzung des Systems verfügen?
-
Produktionskette (Chain of Custody)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass alle Unternehmen, die das zertifizierte Produkt physisch handhaben, sich einem CoC-Audit unterziehen, wenn das Produkt für den Einzelhandelsverkauf als zertifiziertes, gekennzeichnetes Produkt bestimmt sein kann?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass alle Unternehmen, die das zertifizierte Produkt physisch handhaben, sich einem CoC-Audit unterziehen, wenn das Produkt für den Einzelhandelsverkauf als zertifiziertes, gekennzeichnetes Produkt bestimmt sein kann?
-
Laboruntersuchungen
-
Wird in der dokumentierten Bewertungsmethodik auf Testmethoden verwiesen oder sind diese enthalten?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Gibt es Vorgaben für Stichproben bei der Konformitätsüberwachung?
Mögliche Antworten
- No (0 Punkte)
- Yes (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Gibt es ein Verfahren für den Umgang mit nicht-konformen Produkten, die von einem Kunden/Lizenznehmer hergestellt wurden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Wird in der dokumentierten Bewertungsmethodik auf Testmethoden verwiesen oder sind diese enthalten?
-
Konformitätsbewertungsverfahren
-
Kompetenzen der Prüfer*innen
-
Legt die standardsetzende Organisation die Qualifikationen, Kompetenzen, die erforderliche Mindesterfahrung in der Branche und die Schulungsanforderungen für die Prüfer*innen für Konformitäts- / Aufsichtskontrollen fest?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
-
Legt die standardsetzende Organisation die Qualifikationen, Kompetenzen, die erforderliche Mindesterfahrung in der Branche und die Schulungsanforderungen für die Prüfer*innen für Konformitäts- / Aufsichtskontrollen fest?
Mögliche Antworten
- No (0 Punkte)
- Yes (1 Punkt)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass die Auditor*innen der Konformitätsbewertungsstellen eine Auditorenschulung zu einem für das System relevanten Standard, die auf der ISO 19011 oder einer gleichwertigen Norm basiert, erfolgreich absolvieren?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass die Anbieter von Prüfungs- und Aufsichtsleistungen ein Programm zur Überwachung und Sicherstellung der kontinuierlichen Kompetenz und guten Leistung der Prüfer*innen und Auditor*innen durchführen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Führt die standardsetzende Organisation Kalibrierungsmaßnahmen durch oder verlangt sie von den Konformitätsbewertungsstellen, dass sie sicherstellen, dass die der Prüfer*innen / Auditor*innen aufeinander abgestimmt sind?
Mögliche Antworten
- Annually (2 Punkte)
- Ad Hoc (1 Punkt)
- No (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass die Konformitätsbewertungsstellen über einen Verhaltenskodex oder ein gleichwertiges Instrument sowie über unterstützende Verfahren verfügt, um das Verhalten und die Handlungen der Mitarbeitenden der Konformitätsbewertungsstelle zu lenken und gegen Fehlverhalten vorzugehen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Bewertet die standardsetzende Organisation potenzielle Risiken für die Unparteilichkeit der Prüfer*innen und verlangt sie, wo dies gerechtfertigt ist, von den Konformitätsbewertungsstellen und Aufsichtsgremien, Praktiken zur Minderung dieser Risiken anzuwenden?
Mögliche Antworten
- No (0 Punkte)
- Yes (1 Punkt)
-
Legt die standardsetzende Organisation die Qualifikationen, Kompetenzen, die erforderliche Mindesterfahrung in der Branche und die Schulungsanforderungen für die Prüfer*innen für Konformitäts- / Aufsichtskontrollen fest?
-
Aufsicht
-
Erfordert das System einen Aufsichtsmechanismus und ist dieser dokumentiert?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
-
Wird die Aufsicht von einer dritten Partei durchgeführt, die von der standardsetzenden Organisation und den Konformitätsbewertungsstellen unabhängig ist?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Legt die standardsetzende Organisation die Art und Intensität der Aufsichtstätigkeiten über die Konformitätsbewertungsstellen fest?
Mögliche Antworten
- <1 year (2 Punkte)
- 1 year (2 Punkte)
- 2-3 years (2 Punkte)
- 4-5 years (1 Punkt)
- >5 years (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
- None (0 Punkte)
-
Berücksichtigt die Intensität der Aufsichtstätigkeiten die Risikofaktoren, die mit der Konformitätsbewertungsstelle und ihrem Personal verbunden sind?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Legt die standardsetzende Organisation das Bewerbungs- und Auswahlverfahren für Konformitätsbewertungsstellen klar fest?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Bewertet die standardsetzende Organisation die systemspezifische Kompetenz bei der Zulassung von Konformitätsbewertungsstellen, die nach anderen einschlägigen Standards akkreditiert sind (Proxy-Akkreditierung)?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Ja, Bewertung der programmspezifischen Kompetenz (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über dokumentierte und zugängliche Beschwerde- und Einspruchsmechanismen oder verlangt es von den Aufsichtsstellen solche?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Legt die standardsetzende Organisation fest oder verlangt sie von der Aufsichtsstelle, dass sie festlegt, wie die Konformitätsbewertungsstellen mit den durch die Aufsicht festgestellten Nichtkonformitäten umgehen müssen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass Zusammenfassungen von Aufsichtsberichten (ohne persönliche und wirtschaftlich sensible Informationen) öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (auf Anfrage) (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich (2 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass die Vor-Ort-Prüfung der Konformitätsbewertungsstelle in den Aufsichtszyklus einbezogen werden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation, dass die Aufsichtsstelle auch Überprüfungen der Leistung der Konformitätsbewertungsstelle vor Ort umfasst?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Erfordert das System einen Aufsichtsmechanismus und ist dieser dokumentiert?
-
Konformitätskontrollsystem
-
Claims und Rückverfolgbarkeit
-
Rückverfolgbarkeit
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über einen dokumentierten Chain-of-Custody-Standard oder andere Rückverfolgbarkeitsanforderungen, die für die gesamte Lieferkette gelten?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja, auf Anfrage (1 Punkt)
- Ja, öffentlich (2 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Gibt es CoC-Anforderungen für nicht zertifiziertes Material, falls die Vermischung von zertifizierten mit nicht zertifizierten Inputs erlaubt ist?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt die standardsetzende Organisation von den Konformitätsbewertungsstellen, dass sie überprüfen, ob alle Unternehmen innerhalb der Produktkette genaue und zugängliche Aufzeichnungen führen, anhand derer jedes zertifizierte Produkt oder jede Charge von Produkten von der Verkaufsstelle bis zum Käufer zurückverfolgt werden kann?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Sind Unternehmen verpflichtet, CoC-Aufzeichnungen mindestens für die Gültigkeitsdauer des Zertifikats aufzubewahren?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verfügt das System über ein Rückverfolgbarkeitssystem, das die Überprüfung des Produktflusses zwischen den Lieferkettenstufen ermöglicht?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über einen dokumentierten Chain-of-Custody-Standard oder andere Rückverfolgbarkeitsanforderungen, die für die gesamte Lieferkette gelten?
-
Claims und Produktkennzeichnung
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über dokumentierte Anforderungen für die Verwendung von Symbolen, Logos und/oder Claims im Zusammenhang mit dem Standard und macht diese öffentlich zugänglich?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
-
Sind in den Kennzeichnungsrichtlinien die Arten von Claims festgelegt, die für verschiedene Arten von CoC-Modellen geltend gemacht werden können, wenn die standardsetzende Organisation mehr als ein Modell zulässt?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Müssen Claims- und Label-Nutzer*innen eindeutige Lizenznummern oder andere Rückverfolgungsmechanismen verwenden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verlangt der Systeminhaber eine Überwachung der korrekten Verwendung von Claims und Kennzeichnungen auf dem Markt, einschließlich eines Beschwerdemechanismus zur Meldung von Missbrauch?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Ist das Etikett mit einer erklärenden Textaussage oder einem Link zu weiteren Informationen versehen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Not applicable (0 Punkte)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über ein Verfahren, in dem spezifische Folgen bei Missbrauch von Claims festgelegt sind, und verlangen sie dies auch von ihren Konformitätsbewertungsstellen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
-
Verfügt die standardsetzende Organisation über dokumentierte Anforderungen für die Verwendung von Symbolen, Logos und/oder Claims im Zusammenhang mit dem Standard und macht diese öffentlich zugänglich?
-
Rückverfolgbarkeit
Umweltfreundlichkeit 69%
-
Gefährliche Chemikalien - besonders besorgniserregende Stoffe gemäß REACH
-
Für die menschliche Gesundheit schädliche Chemikalien
-
Biologische Abbaubarkeit von Stoffen
-
Umweltschädliche Chemikalien
-
Chemikalienrückstände
-
Grenzwerte für Abwasserparameter
-
Vorgaben für die Produktion von Naturfasern
-
Verwendung von synthetischen Fasern
-
Chemikalien
-
Verwendung von Chemikalien
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Verwendung von Chemikalien?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Document use of all chemicals (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Increase efficiency/reduce chemical use (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4.3 Material and Chemical Inventory Requirement(s) Bronze level: Characterize all homogeneous materials in the product by concentration and generic material type or category/name. In addition, fully define the chemical composition of products that are released directly into the biosphere as part of their intended use (e.g., soaps, paints). For other product types, collect the chemical composition information necessary to assess at least 75% of the product. Silver level: Fully define the chemical composition of products released directly into the biosphere as part of their intended use (e.g., soaps, paints). For other product types, collect the chemical composition information necessary to assess at least 95% of the product. Gold level: Fully define the chemical composition of all homogeneous materials subject to review within the product. Platinum level: Fully define the chemical composition of all process chemistry that comes into contact with the product or its material constituents during the final manufacturing stage. 4.5 Material Health Optimization Strategy [...] For the Bronze and Silver levels, the strategy must include a plan for assessing and optimizing or eliminating all X/x-assessed and GREY/grey materials and chemicals subject to review. One or more material(s) or chemical(s) must be targeted for specific optimization actions in the near-term (defined as 0-3 years). Optimization work relevant to at least one material or chemical must have been completed during the three-year period between certification and recertification. 1 OVERVIEW 1.1 Purpose and Content This document describes the methodology used to assign an A, B, C, X, or GREY material assessment rating to each homogeneous material subject to review in a finished product that is applying for certification to the Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard. The procedure uses toxicity data for individual chemical substances, and/or toxicity data on homogeneous mixtures where available, from peer-reviewed studies, authoritative lists, and other sources, as well as a qualitative exposure assessment that considers specific product manufacturing, use, and end-of-use scenarios to determine whether the material contains one or more substances that have the potential to adversely impact human or environmental health. The methodology applies to all types of homogeneous materials except those for which customized methodologies have been developed: • textile dyestuffs and pigments (see separate document, Colorants Assessment Methodology), • biological materials (see separate document, Biological Materials Assessment Methodology), • geological materials (see separate document, Geological Materials Assessment Methodology), • polymeric materials (see separate document, Polymer Assessment Methodology) • recycled content materials (see separate document, Recycled Content Assessment Methodology) Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 4.3 Material and Chemical Inventory Required Documentation • For the Bronze through Gold levels: A C2CPII Bill of Materials Form or equivalent listing all materials in the product or product group seeking certification (a Bill of Materials form is available to Cradle to Cradle Certified assessors). o If a Bill of Materials Form is provided in the supplier’s own format, the checklist from the C2CPII Bill of Materials Form (Overview & Attestation tab) must be followed. • For the Platinum level: o A description of what substances are used during the processes constituting the final manufacturing stage of the product and how process chemicals subject to review were determined. o A separate C2CPII Bill of Materials Form or equivalent for process chemistry. • For each material to be assessed: o Full composition information that can be unambiguously attributed to the relevant manufacturer(s), formulator(s), or other supplier(s) and cross referenced with the Bill of Materials. ▪ If full composition information cannot be obtained, safety data sheets (SDSs) may be collected for general composition information. However, an SDS alone is insufficient to determine full chemical composition. ▪ If neither full composition information nor an SDS can be obtained, data collection must be sufficient to otherwise identify the need for additional material testing (e.g., for biological, recycled content, and geological material testing). o Recommended: A signed declaration regarding any substances listed in Annex VI to CLP that are present in the material above any of their Specific Concentration Levels (SCLs). Note: CMR & SVHC declarations are an alternative for achieving the Silver level Section 4.6 Using Optimized Materials requirements when full chemical composition cannot be obtained. Obtaining these declarations for all materials will also provide additional assurance that substances with low Specific Concentration Limits (which may be at risk of being overlooked in the data collection and disclosure process) are identified.
Referenzdokumente:
Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard Version 4.1 4 // Material Health Requirements Material Health Assessment Methodology, February 2022 1 OVERVIEW Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 4 // Material Health Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu gefährlichen Chemikalien, die auf der REACH Kandidatenliste als besonders besorgniserregende Stoffe gelistet sind?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: SVHC of Candidate List is prohibited but specific derogations/deviations/exceptions for a defined use OR lists prohibited/restricted substances based risk on an assessment (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Prohibit use except for defined derogations. (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Section 4.1 restrictions are based on leading chemical regulations or directives. The chemical regulations or directives included are those currently in effect in the European Union (EU) under the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation, the Persistent Organic Pollutants Regulation (POPs), the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS), the EU Toy Safety Directive, and the Cosmetics Products Regulation, Annexes II, III, and V (see legend at right). These restrictions are grouped into a list that applies to all homogeneous materials subject to review in all products (REACH and POPs) and three supplementary lists (RoHS, Toy Directive, and Cosmetics Products Regulation), which include additional restrictions specific to certain product types. Each list is accessible through the tabs starting with ""4.1"", or through the links below the Legend table. The applicable thresholds from the cited regulations or directives may not be exceeded for the listed restricted substances present in any homogeneous material subject to review in a certified product. Some substances may be present on multiple lists with differing thresholds or restriction conditions. In such cases, the most conservative applicable restriction must be met. Consult the regulations or directives at the top of each Section 4.1 list for the maximum allowable concentrations for each substance. The restrictions outlined in Section 4.1, derived from various regulations and directives, are applied in accordance with the scope, derogations, and exemptions specified in each respective citation. Consequently, products and materials that contain restricted substances, but adhere to the cited regulations or directives due to applicable scope, derogations, or exemptions, are considered to be compliant with the requirements in this section of the standard. Although the regulations and directives cited in this section only apply to products sold in the EU, the requirements in Section 4.1 apply to all Version 4.1 C2C Certified products. Therefore, certified products not sold in the EU but that are in scope according to these regulations are still required to be in compliance with the restrictions on this list. For more information on these requirements, see the C2C Certified Product Standard, Version 4.1, Section 4.1. Additionally, consult the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) links at the top of each Section 4.1 list for an expanded set of chemical names and CAS numbers, as well as the restriction notes for substances where applicable. Legend Persistent Organic Pollutants Banned by Stockholm Convention and/or EU Commission EU Commission Regulation No 2019/1021 All products
Referenzdokumente:
Section 4.1: Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations Overview and Scope
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien für H-Sätze?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Bei der Risikobewertung ODER der Auswahl von Stoffen für MRSL werden die H-Sätze berücksichtigt. (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Verbot der Verwendung (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4 // Material Health Requirements Category Intent Chemicals and materials used in the product are selected to prioritize the protection of human health and the environment, generating a positive impact on the quality of materials available for future use and cycling. Requirements Summary To achieve a desired level within the category, the requirements at all lower levels must also be met. 4.6: Product is optimized for Material Health (i.e., all x-assessed chemicals replaced or phased out). - Gold, Platinum 3.2 Information Sources [...] As a first pass to screen for widely recognized and well established hazards, the use of authoritative hazard lists such as those issued by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), California’s Proposition 65 List, and lists maintained by various countries based on category criteria of the Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labeling (GHS) will often be helpful. Some of these lists are explicitly cited in the methodology and within endpoint criteria. In instances where multiple lists cited in the methodology would lead to conflicting hazard ratings, as per the established criteria, the result from the list yielding the most conservative Cradle to Cradle Certified hazard rating (in the order RED, YELLOW, GREEN) is to be used. Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Restricted Substances 4.6x-Assessesd Chemicals Carcinogenicity Known, presumed, or suspected carcinogen. GHS Category 1A, 1B, 2 H350, H351 MAK III 1, 2, 3B IARC Group 1, 2A, 2B TLV A1, A2, A3 Mutagenicity •Evidence of mutagenicity supported by positive results in vitro or in vivo GHS Category 1A, 1B, 2 H340, H341 MAK IX 1, 2, 3A, 3B Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity •Known, presumed, or suspected of causing adverse effects to sexual function and fertility and/or to the development of an embryo or fetus based on human or animal studies. •Oral NOAEL < 50 mg/kg BW/day •Inhalation NOAEL <0.25 mg/L 6-8 h/day GHS Category 1A, 1B, 2 H360, H361 MAK Group A or B [See rest of table in 4.6x-Assessesd Chemicals sheet of Excel file]
Referenzdokumente:
Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard Version 4.1 4 // Material Health Requirements Material Health Assessment Methodology 3.2 Information Sources Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Restricted Substances 4.6x-Assessesd Chemicals
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Verwendung von Bioziden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Beschränkung der Verwendung von Bioziden in der Textilveredelung (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Verbot der Verwendung von Bioziden bei der Textilveredelung (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
2.2 Products Not Eligible for the Bronze Achievement Level in Material Health Children’s products, cosmetics, and personal care products are not eligible for certification at the Bronze achievement level in the Material Health category (i.e., they must meet the Silver achievement level requirements or higher in Material Health). The intent is to ensure they do not contain carcinogens, mutagens, or reproductive toxicants (CMRs); persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances (PBTs); very persistent and very bioaccumulative substances (vPvBs); or substances that cause an equivalent level of concern. 2.3 Products Not Eligible for the Bronze or Silver Achievement Level in Product Circularity Eligible single-use plastic products and plastic packaging products (when certified as a separate product) are not eligible for certification at the Bronze or Silver achievement level in the Product Circularity category (i.e., they must meet the Gold or Platinum achievement level requirements in Product Circularity). The intent is to ensure alignment with the Cradle to Cradle principles for these typically noncircular product types. An exemption is made for plastic packaging that is part of a refill/reuse system (e.g., soap refill pouches), which may be certified at any achievement level in the Product Circularity category Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance Further Explanation The following product types are not eligible for Cradle to Cradle certification: 1. Products that are contrary to the intent of the Cradle to Cradle principles, including: [...] h. Products for which the core functionality is intrinsically tied to toxic active ingredients, thus rendering the product non-optimizable (e.g., herbicides, insecticides, rodenticides, and antimicrobial products with x-assessed antimicrobial agents) or textiles/apparel with such products intentionally added, i. Disinfectants (including those used for human hygiene) containing active ingredients/substances that are not approved for use per leading regulations. This is defined as disinfectants containing substances that are not approved for use in the relevant product type per the European Union’s Biocidal Products Regulation (e.g., antimicrobial cleaning products, soaps, or hand sanitizers/hand rubs with triclosan or triclocarban),
Referenzdokumente:
2 // Product Eligibility
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Verwendung von Formaldehyd?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: All Materials in All Products Substances on this list are subject to restriction in all homogeneous materials subject to review in a certified product according to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH), Annex XIV and Annex XVII, and Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 (POPs). The applicable thresholds from the cited regulations may not be exceeded for listed substances present in any homogeneous material subject to review in a certified product. Although REACH and POPs only apply to products sold in the EU, the requirements in Section 4.1 apply to all C2C certified products. Therefore, certified products not sold in the EU but that are in scope according to these regulations are still required to be in compliance with the restrictions within. While all products are subject to the regulations listed on this tab, some REACH Annex XVII restrictions only apply to specific product and material types. Column E provides information on product and material applicability for each restriction. See REACH Annex XVII for more information on these product types. Instructions: Use the filter in Column E (Product/Material Applicability) to select all product and material types that apply to the product or material seeking compliance. In this list, All Products and Several - See Regulation should always be checked. Then, determine whether any substances in Column B are present. Listed substances must be included in supplier declarations to C2CPII (including name, CAS Number, and concentration). Substance name Reaction products of 1,3,4-thiadiazolidine-2,5-dithione, formaldehyde and 4-heptylphenol, branched and linear (RP-HP) Reaction product of 1,3,4-thiadiazolidine-2,5-dithione, formaldehyde and phenol, heptyl derivs. formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers Formaldehyde Formaldehyde, oligomeric reaction products with aniline Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: Cosmetics and Personal Care Products 4.1 Cosmetics & Personal Care Substances on this list are restricted in any homogeneous material subject to review that meets the following definition for a cosmetic or personal care formulation according to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009. The applicable thresholds from the cited regulation may not be exceeded for listed substances present in any homogeneous material subject to review in a certified product. ‘Cosmetic product’ is defined according to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as any substance or mixture intended to be placed in contact with the external parts of the human body (epidermis, hair system, nails, lips and external genital organs) or with the teeth and the mucous membranes of the oral cavity with a view exclusively or mainly to cleaning them, perfuming them, changing their appearance, protecting them, keeping them in good condition or correcting body odours. Products not in scope according to this regulation are not required to meet the restrictions on this list. Although Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 only applies to products sold in the EU, the requirements in Section 4.1 apply to all certified products. Therefore, certified products not sold in the EU but that are in scope according to this regulation are still required to be in compliance with the restrictions within. Substance name: [...] formaldehyde Paraformaldehyde Reaction products of paraformaldehyde with 2-hydroxypropylamine (3:2) Reaction products of paraformaldehyde with 2-hydroxypropylamine (1:1) Reaction product of acetophenone, formaldehyde, cyclohexylamine, methanol and acetic acid
Referenzdokumente:
Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: All Materials in All Products
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Verwendung von Nanomaterialien?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Restrict the use of nanomaterials (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Verbot der Verwendung von Nanomaterialien (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Further Explanation 2. Products that the program requirements were not written to address, including: [...] h. Nanomaterials (Note: Eligibility to be revisited once the Material Health Assessment Methodology is updated to more explicitly address the related human and environmental health issues.)
Referenzdokumente:
2 // Product Eligibility
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Verwendung von Flammschutzmitteln?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Verbot der Verwendung (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4.2 Avoidance of Organohalogens and Functionally Related Chemical Classes of Concern Intended Outcome(s) Organohalogens, a class of substances associated with toxicity concerns in multiple use-cycle stages, are progressively avoided, beginning with high organohalogen content materials, classes of special concern, and functionally related, non-halogenated classes of equivalent concern (e.g., organophosphate ester flame retardants being used in lieu of halogenated flame retardants). Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: Homogeneous materials subject to review are not and do not contain organohalogen substances of special concern, or functionally related, non-halogenated substances of equivalent concern (i.e., per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) and organophosphate ester flame retardants (OPFRs), halogenated polymers, halogenated organic solvents, and other highly halogenated, carbon-based materials), above relevant thresholds. Certain exemptions apply. [...] For the Bronze level, the applicable restrictions for organohalogen substances of special concern are: [...] 2. HFRs: Halogenated flame retardants are defined as any chlorinated or brominated substance added to a material for the purpose of increasing heat/fire resistance or decreasing flammability. This restriction applies to the set of HFRs listed in the Cradle to Cradle Certified® Restricted Substances reference document for this section, regardless of the intended purpose/function in the material, and any halogenated substances intentionally added to the product for the purpose of increasing heat/fire resistance or decreasing flammability. In addition to the applicable Bronze level regulatory restrictions on specific HFRs (see Section 4.1), carbon-bonded chlorine and bromine within any flame retardant in the material (intentionally added or present as an impurity) must be < 1,000 ppm of the homogeneous material by weight (except in exempt materials/parts as noted below).
Referenzdokumente:
4 // Material Health Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien für die biologische Abbaubarkeit von Stoffen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
5.4 Material Compatibility for Technical and/or Biological Cycles Intended Outcome(s) Product materials with the highest capacity for biological and/or technical cycling have been intentionally selected, increasing the likelihood that such materials will retain their value and move through subsequent cycles of use. - Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum For a material to count toward the percentage of materials compatible with the intended cycling pathway(s) the following conditions must be met: 4. For solid materials intended for the biological cycle, one of the following conditions must be met: a. The material must biodegrade in the intended cycling pathway(s) within the time period and to the extent specified by a C2CPII-recognized compostability or biodegradability standard test. b. For paper and biological materials with ≥ 99% unmodified organic material: i. The material, at its maximum thickness and/or density, must disintegrate in the intended cycling pathway(s) within the time period and to the extent specified by a C2CPIIrecognized compostability or biodegradability standard test, and [...] c. For plastic materials, biologically derived materials, and biological materials with < 99% unmodified organic material (including paper that is < 99% cellulose), all of the following conditions must be met: i. The material must biodegrade in the intended cycling pathway(s) within the time period and to the extent specified by a C2CPII-recognized compostability standard test. ii. For any individual organic additives (e.g., pigments, inks, colorants, scents, secondary polymers, glues) present at a concentration of ≥ 1%, the additive must biodegrade in the intended cycling pathway(s) within a specific time period and to the extent specified by: 1. A C2CPII-recognized biodegradability standard test, or 2. The available scientific literature and/or research studies. [...] 5. For materials with unavoidable release to the environment during product use (e.g., tires, shoe soles, brake pads, apparel textile fibers), the fraction of material that on average is likely to be released to the environment from the total product over its lifetime may not be counted as compatible with the intended cycling pathway, unless it is biodegradable in the likely environment where release occurs. 8. For products that are liquid formulations (excluding wet-applied products), individual substances within the formulation, or the formulation as a whole may be evaluated when determining the percentage compatible for the biological cycle. a. When evaluating based on individual substance(s), the following conditions apply: i. For organic chemicals and surfactants to count toward the percentage compatible, the substance must biodegrade in the intended cycling pathway(s) within the time period and extent specified by a C2CPII-recognized biodegradability standard test. In addition, 1. Organic chemicals with a log Koc < 4.5 must meet the OECD definition for ultimate biodegradability (aerobic), and 2. Organic chemicals with a log Koc ≥ 1.5 must meet the OECD definition of anaerobic biodegradability. [...] b. When evaluating the formulation as a whole, if one of the following requirements have been met the product counts as 100% compatible for the biological cycle: i. The formulation has demonstrated ready biodegradability in both anaerobic and aerobic conditions as demonstrated by a C2CPII-recognized biodegradability standard test. (The formulation may also contain benign mineral nutrients.) ii. For consumable consumer products (e.g., shampoo, detergents), the material must biodegrade in the intended cycling pathway(s) within the time period and to the extent specified by a C2CPII-recognized biodegradability standard test. For the Gold level: The use of materials with high-value cycling potential (i.e., high-quality material as defined in #1-2 below) is required. [...] 2. Select liquid formulations (e.g., soaps, cleaning products, lubricants) must meet minimum percent ready biodegradability and/or anaerobic biodegradability requirements; testing may be required. (Note: > 90% biodegradation of organic substances is required in some cases.)
Referenzdokumente:
5 // Product Circularity Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien zu den H-Sätzen H400, H410, H411?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Aufnahme von Anforderungen für eine ökologische Risikobewertung der verwendeten Stoffe ODER die Auswahl von Stoffen für MRSL berücksichtigt H-Sätze (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Verbot der Verwendung von H-Sätzen außer für die in dem Guidance aufgeführten Stoffgruppen (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4 // Material Health Requirements Category Intent Chemicals and materials used in the product are selected to prioritize the protection of human health and the environment, generating a positive impact on the quality of materials available for future use and cycling. Requirements Summary To achieve a desired level within the category, the requirements at all lower levels must also be met. 4.6: Product is optimized for Material Health (i.e., all x-assessed chemicals replaced or phased out). - Gold, Platinum 3.2 Information Sources [...] As a first pass to screen for widely recognized and well established hazards, the use of authoritative hazard lists such as those issued by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), California’s Proposition 65 List, and lists maintained by various countries based on category criteria of the Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labeling (GHS) will often be helpful. Some of these lists are explicitly cited in the methodology and within endpoint criteria. In instances where multiple lists cited in the methodology would lead to conflicting hazard ratings, as per the established criteria, the result from the list yielding the most conservative Cradle to Cradle Certified hazard rating (in the order RED, YELLOW, GREEN) is to be used. Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Restricted Substances 4.6x-Assessesd Chemicals Starting at the Gold level, Section 4.6 restricts the use of X/x assessed materials and chemicals in the product. Only A/a, B/b, and C/c assessed materials and chemicals may be used in the product. Background on C2C Certified Material Health Assessment The C2C Certified Material Health Assessment Methodology involves evaluating each chemical constituent of a material for 20 human and environmental health hazard endpoints to assign hazard ratings, which can be Green, Yellow, Red, Purple, or Grey. Chemicals that retain endpoints with 'RED' or 'PURPLE' risk flags following an exposure assessment are considered hazardous and assessed as 'x'. Additional Information The C2C Certified Material Health assessment process is further discussed in the C2C Certified Product Standard Section 4.4: Assessing Chemicals and Materials and in the Material Health Assessment Methodology (MHAM). The C2C Certified exposure assessment process is further discussed in the Exposure Assessment Methodology (EAM). Aquatic Toxicity Acute •Classified as GHS Category 1 or 2 (fish, daphnia, or algae) •96 hour fish LC50 ≤ 10 mg/L (experimental or modeled) •48 hour daphnia L(E)C50 ≤ 10 mg/L (experimental or modeled) •72/96 hour L(E)C50 ≤ 10 mg/L (experimental or modeled) Chronic •Fish, daphnia, or algae NOEC ≤ 1 mg/L for chronic toxicity (experimental or modeled) GHS Category 1 or 2 - Acute (fish, daphnia, or algae) GHS Category 1, 2, or 3 - Chronic (fish, daphnia, or algae) H400, 410, H411, H412, H413
Referenzdokumente:
Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard Version 4.1 4 // Material Health Requirements Material Health Assessment Methodology 3.2 Information Sources Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Restricted Substances 4.6x-Assessesd Chemicals
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für die Prüfung des Endprodukts auf Chemikalienrückstände?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4.4 Assessing Chemicals and Materials Intended Outcome(s) To encourage continued improvement of Material Health, an increasing percentage of the product’s chemicals and materials are assessed. By the time a product reaches the Gold level, all materials and chemicals subject to review within the product have been assessed as compatible with human and environmental health according to the Cradle to Cradle Certified Material Health Assessment Methodology. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum Requirement(s) Bronze level: Assess at least 75% of the product. Silver level: Assess at least 95% of the product. Gold level: Assess 100% of the product. Platinum level: Assess 100% of the product AND all process chemistry that comes into contact with the product or its material constituents during the final manufacturing stage.
Referenzdokumente:
4 // Material Health Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für gefährliche Chemikalien gemäß (1) dem Stockholmer Überein-kommen, (2) den WHO-Klassen 1A und B und (3) dem Rotterdam-Übereinkommen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Section 4.1 restrictions are based on leading chemical regulations or directives. The chemical regulations or directives included are those currently in effect in the European Union (EU) under the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation, the Persistent Organic Pollutants Regulation (POPs), the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS), the EU Toy Safety Directive, and the Cosmetics Products Regulation, Annexes II, III, and V (see legend at right). These restrictions are grouped into a list that applies to all homogeneous materials subject to review in all products (REACH and POPs) and three supplementary lists (RoHS, Toy Directive, and Cosmetics Products Regulation), which include additional restrictions specific to certain product types. Each list is accessible through the tabs starting with ""4.1"", or through the links below the Legend table. The applicable thresholds from the cited regulations or directives may not be exceeded for the listed restricted substances present in any homogeneous material subject to review in a certified product. Some substances may be present on multiple lists with differing thresholds or restriction conditions. In such cases, the most conservative applicable restriction must be met. Consult the regulations or directives at the top of each Section 4.1 list for the maximum allowable concentrations for each substance. The restrictions outlined in Section 4.1, derived from various regulations and directives, are applied in accordance with the scope, derogations, and exemptions specified in each respective citation. Consequently, products and materials that contain restricted substances, but adhere to the cited regulations or directives due to applicable scope, derogations, or exemptions, are considered to be compliant with the requirements in this section of the standard. Although the regulations and directives cited in this section only apply to products sold in the EU, the requirements in Section 4.1 apply to all Version 4.1 C2C Certified products. Therefore, certified products not sold in the EU but that are in scope according to these regulations are still required to be in compliance with the restrictions on this list. For more information on these requirements, see the C2C Certified Product Standard, Version 4.1, Section 4.1. Additionally, consult the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) links at the top of each Section 4.1 list for an expanded set of chemical names and CAS numbers, as well as the restriction notes for substances where applicable. • Persistent Organic Pollutants Banned by Stockholm Convention and/or EU Commission EU Commission Regulation No 2019/1021 – All products
Referenzdokumente:
Section 4.1: Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations Overview and Scope
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für die Verwendung von Farbstoffen oder Pigmenten, die Blei, Kupfer, Chrom, Nickel, Kadmium, Kobalt und Aluminium enthalten, in der Produktionsphase?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4 // Material Health Requirements Category Intent Chemicals and materials used in the product are selected to prioritize the protection of human health and the environment, generating a positive impact on the quality of materials available for future use and cycling. 4.2: Product does not contain organohalogen substances of special concern, or functionally related, non-halogenated classes of equivalent concern, above relevant thresholds. - Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum 4.2: Product does not contain materials with > 1% carbon-bonded halogens by weight, or recognized PBTs or vPvBs. Product does not contain EU CLP Cat.1 and 2 CMRs or substances causing an equivalent level of concern, or exposure is unlikely or expected to be negligible. - Silver, Gold, Platinum Section 4.2: Highly Halogenated Materials Highly halogenated materials are defined as materials containing a sum total of 10% or more of carbon-bonded fluorine, chlorine, and/or bromine by weight. In addition to specific restrictions on PFASs, HFRs, and OPFRs, the use of highly halogenated materials is restricted at all C2C Certified achievement levels. A non-comprehensive list of common highly halogenated materials is provided below. See the Cradle to Cradle Certified Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance, Section 4.2 for more information on this restriction, including exemptions at the Bronze and Silver levels. List of common highly halogenated materials Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Neoprene Dyes and pigments Polystyrene Products with Teflon coating Foam and fiberglass insulation Flame retardants (see HFRs tab) Chlorinated solvents Adhesives 4.1 Electronics (RoHS) Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) Substances on this list are restricted in all homogeneous materials subject to review in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) according to Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (RoHS). The applicable thresholds from the cited directive may not be exceeded for listed substances present in any homogeneous material subject to review in a certified product. EEE is defined according to RoHS as equipment which is dependent on electric currents or electromagnetic fields in order to work properly and equipment for the generation, transfer and measurement of such currents and fields and designed for use with a voltage rating not exceeding 1000 volts for alternating current and 1500 volts for direct current. Products not in scope according to this directive are not required to meet the restrictions on this list. Although RoHS only applies to products sold in the EU, the requirements in Section 4.1 apply to all C2C certified products. Therefore, certified products not sold in the EU but that are in scope according to this directive are still required to be in compliance with the restrictions within. Lead Mercury Cadmium Hexavalent chromium Polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP) Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) Diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: Children's Toy Products [...] Cadmium Chromium (III) Chromium (VI) Cobalt Copper Lead Manganese Mercury Nickel [...]
Referenzdokumente:
Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard Version 4.1 4 // Material Health Requirements Cradle to Cradle Certified Restricted Substances List (RSL) 4.2 Highly Halogenated
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für das Verbot von Azofarbstoffen, die in der Produktionsphase aromatische Amine abspalten können, die für die menschliche Gesundheit schädlich sind?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: All Materials in All Products Substances on this list are subject to restriction in all homogeneous materials subject to review in a certified product according to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH), Annex XIV and Annex XVII, and Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 (POPs). The applicable thresholds from the cited regulations may not be exceeded for listed substances present in any homogeneous material subject to review in a certified product. Although REACH and POPs only apply to products sold in the EU, the requirements in Section 4.1 apply to all C2C certified products. Therefore, certified products not sold in the EU but that are in scope according to these regulations are still required to be in compliance with the restrictions within. While all products are subject to the regulations listed on this tab, some REACH Annex XVII restrictions only apply to specific product and material types. Column E provides information on product and material applicability for each restriction. See REACH Annex XVII for more information on these product types. Instructions: Use the filter in Column E (Product/Material Applicability) to select all product and material types that apply to the product or material seeking compliance. In this list, All Products and Several - See Regulation should always be checked. Then, determine whether any substances in Column B are present. Listed substances must be included in supplier declarations to C2CPII (including name, CAS Number, and concentration). Substance Name Azocolourants and Azodyes
Referenzdokumente:
Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: All Materials in All Products
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für die Verwendung von Chlorgas, elementarem Chlor und chlororganischen Verbindungen als Bleichmittel?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Verwendung eingeschränkt (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Verwendung verboten (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4.2 Avoidance of Organohalogens and Functionally Related Chemical Classes of Concern [...] For the Bronze level, the applicable restrictions for organohalogen substances of special concern are: [...] 2. HFRs: Halogenated flame retardants are defined as any chlorinated or brominated substance added to a material for the purpose of increasing heat/fire resistance or decreasing flammability. This restriction applies to the set of HFRs listed in the Cradle to Cradle Certified® Restricted Substances reference document for this section, regardless of the intended purpose/function in the material, and any halogenated substances intentionally added to the product for the purpose of increasing heat/fire resistance or decreasing flammability. In addition to the applicable Bronze level regulatory restrictions on specific HFRs (see Section 4.1), carbon-bonded chlorine and bromine within any flame retardant in the material (intentionally added or present as an impurity) must be < 1,000 ppm of the homogeneous material by weight (except in exempt materials/parts as noted below). 4. Halogenated polymers, halogenated organic solvents, and other highly halogenated, carbon-based materials: Any material containing a sum total of 10% or more of carbon-bonded fluorine, chlorine, and/or bromine by weight is considered a highly halogenated carbon-based material and is thus not permitted for use (except in exempt materials/parts as noted below).
Referenzdokumente:
4 // Material Health Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Verwendung von Quecksilber, Kadmium, Blei, Chrom VI?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4.3 Material and Chemical Inventory 3. Exemption: A product may contain a maximum of 1% exempt components by weight. The exemption is allowed for minor, commodity type components including sewing thread and solid, preformed fasteners and bearings. Homogeneous materials and substances in these component types may be exempt from review if the following conditions are met: a. Metallic components are in compliance with the Restriction of Hazardous Substance (RoHS) directive. Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: All Materials in All Products Substances on this list are subject to restriction in all homogeneous materials subject to review in a certified product according to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH), Annex XIV and Annex XVII, and Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 (POPs). The applicable thresholds from the cited regulations may not be exceeded for listed substances present in any homogeneous material subject to review in a certified product. Although REACH and POPs only apply to products sold in the EU, the requirements in Section 4.1 apply to all C2C certified products. Therefore, certified products not sold in the EU but that are in scope according to these regulations are still required to be in compliance with the restrictions within. While all products are subject to the regulations listed on this tab, some REACH Annex XVII restrictions only apply to specific product and material types. Column E provides information on product and material applicability for each restriction. See REACH Annex XVII for more information on these product types. Instructions: Use the filter in Column E (Product/Material Applicability) to select all product and material types that apply to the product or material seeking compliance. In this list, All Products and Several - See Regulation should always be checked. Then, determine whether any substances in Column B are present. Listed substances must be included in supplier declarations to C2CPII (including name, CAS Number, and concentration). Substance name: Cadmium and its compounds Chromium trioxide Chromium VI compounds Lead and its compounds Lead carbonates Lead sulphates Lead sulphate PbSO4 Mercury compounds Mercury Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) Substances on this list are restricted in all homogeneous materials subject to review in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) according to Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (RoHS). The applicable thresholds from the cited directive may not be exceeded for listed substances present in any homogeneous material subject to review in a certified product. EEE is defined according to RoHS as equipment which is dependent on electric currents or electromagnetic fields in order to work properly and equipment for the generation, transfer and measurement of such currents and fields and designed for use with a voltage rating not exceeding 1000 volts for alternating current and 1500 volts for direct current. Products not in scope according to this directive are not required to meet the restrictions on this list. Although RoHS only applies to products sold in the EU, the requirements in Section 4.1 apply to all C2C certified products. Therefore, certified products not sold in the EU but that are in scope according to this directive are still required to be in compliance with the restrictions within. Section 4.6: x-Assessed Chemicals Starting at the Gold level, Section 4.6 restricts the use of X/x assessed materials and chemicals in the product. Only A/a, B/b, and C/c assessed materials and chemicals may be used in the product. Background on C2C Certified Material Health Assessment The C2C Certified Material Health Assessment Methodology involves evaluating each chemical constituent of a material for 20 human and environmental health hazard endpoints to assign hazard ratings, which can be Green, Yellow, Red, Purple, or Grey. Chemicals that retain endpoints with 'RED' or 'PURPLE' risk flags following an exposure assessment are considered hazardous and assessed as 'x'. Additional Information The C2C Certified Material Health assessment process is further discussed in the C2C Certified Product Standard Section 4.4: Assessing Chemicals and Materials and in the Material Health Assessment Methodology (MHAM). The C2C Certified exposure assessment process is further discussed in the Exposure Assessment Methodology (EAM). Toxic Metals Chemical contains a toxic metal compound (antimony, arsenic, cadmium, chromium VI, cobalt, lead, merucry, nickel, thallium, tin (organotins only), radioactive elements, and/or vanadium), and is present at > 100 ppm within a homogeneous material. 3.3.20 Toxic Metals Definition Antimony, arsenic, cadmium, chromium VI, cobalt, lead, mercury, nickel, thallium, tin (organotins only), radioactive elements, and vanadium are considered toxic metals in the Cradle to Cradle Certified methodology. In general, these metals have shown toxic effects regardless of the speciation of the metal, even if incorporated in an organo-metal structure. Rating Criteria If a substance has any of the toxic metals listed above in its molecular structure and that substance is present at a concentration of 100 ppm or higher in a homogeneous material subject to review, the chemical receives a RED rating for this endpoint. If a substance does not have any of the toxic metals listed above in its molecular structure, or the substance is present below 100ppm in the homogeneous material subject to review, the substance receives a GREEN rating for this endpoint, [...]
Referenzdokumente:
Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard Version 4.1 4 // Material Health Requirements Cradle to Cradle Certified Version 4.1 Restricted Substances Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: All Materials in All Products Section 4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations: Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) Material Health Assessment Methodology, February 2022 3.3.20 Toxic Metals
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Verwendung von Chemikalien?
-
Umgang mit gefährlichen Stoffen
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu Lagerung und Kennzeichnung von Chemikalien?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance Required Documentation [...] *The following evidence is required for each policy element (Section 8.2 Human Rights Policy #2a-j) to demonstrate that performance has been measured for the applicant company and all final manufacturing stage facilities: [...] g) Safe and healthy work: Documentation of compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing the work environment, including the following: [...] iii. Hazardous materials handling procedures: Copies of past health and safety reports, preferably conducted by an internal audit or third-party audit firm, to identify any type of health and safety violations. This must include evidence of/that: • Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing ‘Chemical and Hazardous Substances’. • An inventory of chemical and hazardous substances used in the workplace is maintained. • Chemicals used at the workplace are registered for the intended used when applicable. All local safety standards and applicable laws are adhered to. • Material safety data sheets (MSDSs) are prominently posted in both storage and use zones, and maintained in languages understood by workers. • Chemicals and hazardous substances are properly labelled as per label instructions of local safety standard and MSDSs are maintained
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur gezielten Anwendung von Chemikalien?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4.3 Material and Chemical Inventory Requirement(s) Bronze level: Characterize all homogeneous materials in the product by concentration and generic material type or category/name. In addition, fully define the chemical composition of products that are released directly into the biosphere as part of their intended use (e.g., soaps, paints). For other product types, collect the chemical composition information necessary to assess at least 75% of the product. Silver level: Fully define the chemical composition of products released directly into the biosphere as part of their intended use (e.g., soaps, paints). For other product types, collect the chemical composition information necessary to assess at least 95% of the product. Gold level: Fully define the chemical composition of all homogeneous materials subject to review within the product. Platinum level: Fully define the chemical composition of all process chemistry that comes into contact with the product or its material constituents during the final manufacturing stage. 4.5 Material Health Optimization Strategy [...] For the Bronze and Silver levels, the strategy must include a plan for assessing and optimizing or eliminating all X/x-assessed and GREY/grey materials and chemicals subject to review. One or more material(s) or chemical(s) must be targeted for specific optimization actions in the near-term (defined as 0-3 years). Optimization work relevant to at least one material or chemical must have been completed during the three-year period between certification and recertification. 1 OVERVIEW 1.1 Purpose and Content This document describes the methodology used to assign an A, B, C, X, or GREY material assessment rating to each homogeneous material subject to review in a finished product that is applying for certification to the Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard. The procedure uses toxicity data for individual chemical substances, and/or toxicity data on homogeneous mixtures where available, from peer-reviewed studies, authoritative lists, and other sources, as well as a qualitative exposure assessment that considers specific product manufacturing, use, and end-of-use scenarios to determine whether the material contains one or more substances that have the potential to adversely impact human or environmental health. The methodology applies to all types of homogeneous materials except those for which customized methodologies have been developed: • textile dyestuffs and pigments (see separate document, Colorants Assessment Methodology), • biological materials (see separate document, Biological Materials Assessment Methodology), • geological materials (see separate document, Geological Materials Assessment Methodology), • polymeric materials (see separate document, Polymer Assessment Methodology) • recycled content materials (see separate document, Recycled Content Assessment Methodology)
Referenzdokumente:
Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard Version 4.1 4 // Material Health Requirements Material Health Assessment Methodology, February 2022 1 OVERVIEW
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu Schulungen zum Umgang und zum Kontakt mit Chemikalien?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
APPENDIX 2 INTERMEDIATE AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL USE PRODUCTS: VERIFICATION & COMMUNICATION REQUIREMENTS [...] b. Are customers adequately informed regarding the relevant hazard(s)? 48 The applicant must provide evidence that customers are adequately informed regarding the sensitization and/or corrosion/irritation hazard(s), as applicable. The answer must be YES to either of the following questions: i. Are the relevant hazard(s) communicated via regulatory pathways (e.g., safety data sheet or other regulatory document)? Information must be provided on the safety data sheet (SDS) or other regulatory document(s) that effectively inform users of relevant hazards. When determining how hazards are communicated, assessor must consider EU & US OSHA requirements for the relevant industry, OSHA compliance, and SDS indications. Hazard communication through SDS or other regulatory pathways fulfills this requirement. ii. In regions where hazard communication is NOT required by regulation, does the applicant proactively and effectively communicate relevant hazards directly to downstream users via non-regulated pathways? In regions where hazard communication is not required by local regulations, hazard information must be provided on the product label, technical data sheets, or the company website. c. Are downstream customers trained and required to use personal protective equipment? The answer must be YES to either of the following questions: ii. In regions where PPE training and use is NOT required by regulation, has the applicant taken proactive steps to train, or to make training available to, all downstream professional users covering all applicable hazard endpoints? The applicant must provide evidence that customers are adequately trained regarding safe handling of the product, such that it is possible to state that contact or repeated (i.e., once a month or more frequent) contact for corrosion/irritation and sensitization respectively is unlikely to occur. Training may be done by the applicant, an entity contracted by the applicant, or an industry association to which the applicant belongs. Note: This requires proactive action by applicants to ensure that training is provided to professional users. All of the following are required in order to answer ‘yes’ to this question (Appendix 2B, c, ii): • Description of the applicant company’s procedure for training professional customers on safe handling of the product, including a list of designated staff (i.e., job titles). • Job description(s) for staff providing safety trainings. Training of customers on the safe use of the applicant’s products must be a defined responsibility for one or more staff. • Safety training materials as provided to the customer. For example, PowerPoint presentations and/or online guidance and resources. The training information must specifically address the hazards and risks relevant to the certified product(s). Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance *The following evidence is required for each policy element (Section 8.2 Human Rights Policy #2a-j) to demonstrate that performance has been measured for the applicant company and all final manufacturing stage facilities: g. Safe and healthy work: Documentation of compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing the work environment, including the following. Provide this information for each final manufacturing stage facility separately. iii. Hazardous materials handling procedures: Copies of past health and safety reports, preferably conducted by an internal audit or third-party audit firm, to identify any type of health and safety violations. This must include evidence of/that: • Employees who are involved in handling, clean-up and disposal of chemicals and hazardous substances received regular training on emergency response plans and actions (with training records maintained).
Referenzdokumente:
Exposure Assessment Methodology, January 2024 APPENDIX 2 INTERMEDIATE AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL USE PRODUCTS: VERIFICATION & COMMUNICATION REQUIREMENTS Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu spezifischen Verfahren / Kontrollen zum Umgang mit Verschmutzungsvorfälle (zur Eindämmung der Auswirkungen auf die Umwelt)?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
3.2.2 Assessing Environmental Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of environmental risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Identify environmental risks and opportunities for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities and for the certified product. The risk and opportunity assessment must include: 1. A company-level risk assessment, based on conducting desk research at a minimum, to identify known and likely environmental risks associated with the applicant company’s own operations, final manufacturing facilities, the product’s supply chain, product use, product cycling and end of use, relevant communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders. The following issues are de facto high risk for all large companies (defined as companies with ≥ 250,000 employees) and potentially high risk for all other companies: [...] b. Environmental pollution (air, fresh and marine water, soil), [...] The following issues are de facto high risk for final manufacturing stage facilities or for the product, as noted in the scenarios below: e. Air pollution is a high-risk issue for: i. Final manufacturing stage facilities with on-site combustion power plants (including biomass combustion). ii. Final manufacturing stage facilities at which processes commonly known to be airpollutant-intense take place. This includes (but is not limited to): Smelting metals, refining oil, producing cement, using high volumes of organic solvents, and incinerating waste. g. Water and/or soil quality (i.e., pollution) are high-risk issues for: i. Final manufacturing stage facilities with pollutant-intense processes (as defined per the Water & Soil Stewardship requirements). ii. Final manufacturing stage facilities for which stormwater discharge is regulated per the corresponding regional regulatory permitting system. In regions where stormwater is not regulated, any facility within the specific categories of industrial activity that must be covered under the U.S. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System is de facto high risk for this issue. iii. Products that are primary contributors to microfiber and microplastic pollution (i.e., textile and apparel products made from synthetic fibers that are wet processed and/or that require washing with water during the use phase, tires, and plastic pellets). 2. Identification of best practices employed to address the high risks. Note: These may be best practices that are already in place, best practices planned for future implementation, and/or best practices employed by others that could potentially be implemented by the applicant in future. 3. Information regarding the actual and potential impact(s) and importance of each of the risks identified. 4. Prioritization of the risks and opportunities identified. 3.2.3 Monitor & Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on protecting the environment is monitored and verified for tier 1 suppliers, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that environmental risks are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver Requirement(s) Request data measuring performance against the environmental policy from tier 1 suppliers associated with high-risk issues as identified per the risk assessment. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. For the Silver level: 1. Environmental performance data must be requested from all tier 1 suppliers providing components and materials that are subject to review (as defined in Material Health Section 4.3) that are associated with high-risk issues as identified per the Section 3.2.2 risk assessment. 2. If data are outdated or not available, the applicant must arrange for the data to be collected. 3. Data must be generated within the past 24 months. 4. Corrective actions must be planned or ongoing for any poor performance issues identified. At recertification, the applicant must demonstrate progress on: a. Encouraging suppliers to complete corrective actions, b. Tracking whether timelines are adhered to, and c. Taking steps to suspend or terminate relationships with suppliers that fail to make progress on remediation.
Referenzdokumente:
3 // General Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu Lagerung und Kennzeichnung von Chemikalien?
-
Verwendung von Chemikalien
-
Wasser
-
Wassernutzung
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zum Wasserverbrauch in der Produktionsphase?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Kontinuierliche Überwachung des Wasserverbrauchs (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Überwachung sowie Steigerung der Effizienz des Wasserverbrauchs (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.3 Quantifying Water Use Intended Outcome(s) Water withdrawals, discharge, and consumption at facilities manufacturing the product(s) are quantified, creating a baseline against which reductions can be measured, and helping to identify areas for improvement. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Quantify annual water withdrawals, discharge, and consumption for all final manufacturing stage facilities. ---- Data must be collected on the following and the data sources indicated: 1. Withdrawals by source and water type. 2. Discharges by receiving body/destination. 3. Capacity of on-site treatment equipment. 4. Consumption by source. 5. Total amount and percentage of water recycled and reused. Facilities that withdraw or purchase ≥ 100,000 m3 of water per year are considered as having high-volume processes.
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zum Wasserverbrauch in der Produktionsphase?
-
Abwasser
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu Abwasserqualität und Abwasseraufbereitung?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Klärung des Abwassers (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Klärung des Abwassers mit Parametern, die für die Sicherstellung der entsprechenden Abwasserqualität festgelegt wurden (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.1 Characterizing Local and Product-Relevant Water & Soil Issues Intended Outcome(s) Through the assessment and understanding of water- and soil-related impacts attributable to the product, including local water availability and quality issues relevant to the product’s manufacturing facilities, opportunities to address the impacts are identified. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze and Silver Requirement(s) Bronze level: Characterize water and soil related issues for all final manufacturing stage facilities and issues relevant to the product. Silver level: Characterize water and soil related issues at select tier 1 supplier facilities. ---- For the Bronze Level: For all final manufacturing stage facilities: [...] 4. Describe effluent and sludge treatment process(es). 7.2 Effluent Quality Compliance Intended Outcome(s) Final manufacturing stage facilities are in compliance with regulatory and/or industry best practice effluent limitations. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For the final manufacturing stage, treat effluent (either on- or off-site) prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality regulations or guidelines. For off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), request data that will demonstrate if the facility is complying with all applicable laws and regulations. Silver level: For privately owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), treat effluent prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality guidelines or regulations. Alternatively, if privately owned, off-site, treatment facilities are out of compliance, create a strategy to address the issue and report on progress at recertification. Gold level: For government owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), treat effluent prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality guidelines or regulations. Alternatively, if government owned off-site treatment facilities are out of compliance, create a strategy to address the issue. Gold level recertification: For off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (both private and government owned, if any), implement the Silver or Gold level strategy (as applicable) to address any issues with off-site treatment facility compliance. Facilities discharging effluent directly to surface or groundwater must comply with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any), international, or industry best practice effluent quality guidelines for direct discharge. (Note: Facilities discharging via a sewer system that does not route to an effluent treatment facility with at least secondary treatment capabilities or equivalent are discharging directly to surface or groundwater for the purposes of this requirement.) For the Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities meeting this requirement based on regulatory compliance, the parameters addressed in the permit must also be consistent with leading regulations, international guidelines, or industry best practice. Leading regulations are defined as those that include a functioning mechanism through which water quality-based limits are set. Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to an off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., publicly owned treatment works, central effluent treatment plant, or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must comply with required pretreatment limits, if any. For the Silver level: Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to a privately owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., central effluent treatment plant or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must demonstrate that the treatment facility is treating the effluent received to quality standards in line with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any) or international guidelines. If the off-site treatment facility is out of compliance, the issue must be addressed by recertification at the Gold level (see Gold level section that follows). For the Gold level: Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to a government owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., publicly owned treatment works or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must demonstrate that the treatment facility is treating the effluent received to quality standards in line with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any) or international guidelines. If the off-site treatment facility is out of compliance, the issue must be addressed by recertification at the Gold level. Methods of addressing the issue may include demonstrating that the manufacturing facility is not contributing to the issue, the manufacturing facility is complying with regional regulatory (if any), international, or industry best practice effluent quality guidelines for direct discharge, moving the manufacturing plant, or demonstrating that the third party has corrected the issue. Effluent testing When effluent must be tested for verification purposes, sampling and testing must be conducted according to the methods specified by regulatory permits, the off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility, and/or other guidelines as relevant. The analytical laboratory conducting the tests must be accredited or certified for the specific analysis per ISO 17025, NELAP, or equivalent. 7.8 Transparency IntendedOutcome(s) Water use and effluent quality data for final manufacturing stage facilities are available to stakeholders, demonstrating the manufacturer’s commitment to water stewardship. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver and Platinum Requirement(s) Silver level: Make water use data for final manufacturing stage facilities available to stakeholders. Platinum level: Make effluent quality data for the final manufacturing stage facilities available to stakeholders. ---- The data must include: 1. For the Silver through Platinum levels, withdrawals by source and stress level, consumption, and discharge by level of treatment and destination. 2. For the Platinum level, effluent quality test reports as required for verification of the Effluent Quality Compliance requirements (see Section 7.2). 7.10 Optimizing Effluent and Sludge Quality at the Facility Level Intended Outcome(s) Effluent and sludge at final manufacturing facilities are managed with the aim of protecting local water quality and ecosystem health. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Platinum Requirement(s) For the final manufacturing stage facilities: • Establish a comprehensive effluent and sludge quality management system, and • Optimize the effluent and sludge produced as a result of all manufacturing processes used at the facility. Optimizing Effluent and SludgeQuality 1. For conventional water quality parameters, facility(ies) releasing effluent directly to surface or groundwater (defined in Section 7.2) must comply with the more stringent of the limitations indicated by either their permits or as follows: a. pH: 6-9 b. Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD): 25 mg/L c. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): 100 mg/L d. Total Suspended Solids (TSS): 30 mg/L e. Ammonia (as N): 10 mg/L f. Total nitrogen: 10 mg/L g. Total phosphorus: 2.0 mg/L h. Temperature: < 3 °C increase i. Color: 7 m-1 (436 nm; yellow) 5 m-1 (525 nm; red) 3 m-1 (620 nm; blue) j. Oil and grease: 10 mg/L k. Coliform: 400 bacteria/100 ml
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu Abwasservolumen (je Produktionseinheit)?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.3 Quantifying Water Use Intended Outcome(s) Water withdrawals, discharge, and consumption at facilities manufacturing the product(s) are quantified, creating a baseline against which reductions can be measured, and helping to identify areas for improvement. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Quantify annual water withdrawals, discharge, and consumption for all final manufacturing stage facilities. ---- Data must be collected on the following and the data sources indicated: 1. Withdrawals by source and water type. 2. Discharges by receiving body/destination. 3. Capacity of on-site treatment equipment. 4. Consumption by source. 5. Total amount and percentage of water recycled and reused. Facilities that withdraw or purchase ≥ 100,000 m3 of water per year are considered as having high-volume processes.
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Grenzwerte zu grundlegenden Abwasserparametern?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: The scheme refers to national legislation. (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: The schemes requires threshold values on basic wastewater parametersfor different production steps. (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.1 Characterizing Local and Product-Relevant Water & Soil Issues Intended Outcome(s) Through the assessment and understanding of water- and soil-related impacts attributable to the product, including local water availability and quality issues relevant to the product’s manufacturing facilities, opportunities to address the impacts are identified. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze and Silver Requirement(s) Bronze level: Characterize water and soil related issues for all final manufacturing stage facilities and issues relevant to the product. Silver level: Characterize water and soil related issues at select tier 1 supplier facilities. ---- For the Bronze Level: For all final manufacturing stage facilities: [...] 4. Describe effluent and sludge treatment process(es). 7.2 Effluent Quality Compliance Intended Outcome(s) Final manufacturing stage facilities are in compliance with regulatory and/or industry best practice effluent limitations. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For the final manufacturing stage, treat effluent (either on- or off-site) prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality regulations or guidelines. For off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), request data that will demonstrate if the facility is complying with all applicable laws and regulations. Silver level: For privately owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), treat effluent prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality guidelines or regulations. Alternatively, if privately owned, off-site, treatment facilities are out of compliance, create a strategy to address the issue and report on progress at recertification. Gold level: For government owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), treat effluent prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality guidelines or regulations. Alternatively, if government owned off-site treatment facilities are out of compliance, create a strategy to address the issue. Gold level recertification: For off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (both private and government owned, if any), implement the Silver or Gold level strategy (as applicable) to address any issues with off-site treatment facility compliance. Facilities discharging effluent directly to surface or groundwater must comply with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any), international, or industry best practice effluent quality guidelines for direct discharge. (Note: Facilities discharging via a sewer system that does not route to an effluent treatment facility with at least secondary treatment capabilities or equivalent are discharging directly to surface or groundwater for the purposes of this requirement.) For the Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities meeting this requirement based on regulatory compliance, the parameters addressed in the permit must also be consistent with leading regulations, international guidelines, or industry best practice. Leading regulations are defined as those that include a functioning mechanism through which water quality-based limits are set. Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to an off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., publicly owned treatment works, central effluent treatment plant, or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must comply with required pretreatment limits, if any. For the Silver level: Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to a privately owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., central effluent treatment plant or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must demonstrate that the treatment facility is treating the effluent received to quality standards in line with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any) or international guidelines. If the off-site treatment facility is out of compliance, the issue must be addressed by recertification at the Gold level (see Gold level section that follows). For the Gold level: Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to a government owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., publicly owned treatment works or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must demonstrate that the treatment facility is treating the effluent received to quality standards in line with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any) or international guidelines. If the off-site treatment facility is out of compliance, the issue must be addressed by recertification at the Gold level. Methods of addressing the issue may include demonstrating that the manufacturing facility is not contributing to the issue, the manufacturing facility is complying with regional regulatory (if any), international, or industry best practice effluent quality guidelines for direct discharge, moving the manufacturing plant, or demonstrating that the third party has corrected the issue. Effluent testing When effluent must be tested for verification purposes, sampling and testing must be conducted according to the methods specified by regulatory permits, the off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility, and/or other guidelines as relevant. The analytical laboratory conducting the tests must be accredited or certified for the specific analysis per ISO 17025, NELAP, or equivalent. 7.8 Transparency IntendedOutcome(s) Water use and effluent quality data for final manufacturing stage facilities are available to stakeholders, demonstrating the manufacturer’s commitment to water stewardship. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver and Platinum Requirement(s) Silver level: Make water use data for final manufacturing stage facilities available to stakeholders. Platinum level: Make effluent quality data for the final manufacturing stage facilities available to stakeholders. ---- The data must include: 1. For the Silver through Platinum levels, withdrawals by source and stress level, consumption, and discharge by level of treatment and destination. 2. For the Platinum level, effluent quality test reports as required for verification of the Effluent Quality Compliance requirements (see Section 7.2). 7.10 Optimizing Effluent and Sludge Quality at the Facility Level Intended Outcome(s) Effluent and sludge at final manufacturing facilities are managed with the aim of protecting local water quality and ecosystem health. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Platinum Requirement(s) For the final manufacturing stage facilities: • Establish a comprehensive effluent and sludge quality management system, and • Optimize the effluent and sludge produced as a result of all manufacturing processes used at the facility. Optimizing Effluent and SludgeQuality 1. For conventional water quality parameters, facility(ies) releasing effluent directly to surface or groundwater (defined in Section 7.2) must comply with the more stringent of the limitations indicated by either their permits or as follows: a. pH: 6-9 b. Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD): 25 mg/L c. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): 100 mg/L d. Total Suspended Solids (TSS): 30 mg/L e. Ammonia (as N): 10 mg/L f. Total nitrogen: 10 mg/L g. Total phosphorus: 2.0 mg/L h. Temperature: < 3 °C increase i. Color: 7 m-1 (436 nm; yellow) 5 m-1 (525 nm; red) 3 m-1 (620 nm; blue) j. Oil and grease: 10 mg/L k. Coliform: 400 bacteria/100 ml
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Grenzwerte zu erweiterten Abwasserparametern?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.1 Characterizing Local and Product-Relevant Water & Soil Issues Intended Outcome(s) Through the assessment and understanding of water- and soil-related impacts attributable to the product, including local water availability and quality issues relevant to the product’s manufacturing facilities, opportunities to address the impacts are identified. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze and Silver Requirement(s) Bronze level: Characterize water and soil related issues for all final manufacturing stage facilities and issues relevant to the product. Silver level: Characterize water and soil related issues at select tier 1 supplier facilities. ---- For the Bronze Level: For all final manufacturing stage facilities: [...] 4. Describe effluent and sludge treatment process(es). 7.2 Effluent Quality Compliance Intended Outcome(s) Final manufacturing stage facilities are in compliance with regulatory and/or industry best practice effluent limitations. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For the final manufacturing stage, treat effluent (either on- or off-site) prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality regulations or guidelines. For off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), request data that will demonstrate if the facility is complying with all applicable laws and regulations. Silver level: For privately owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), treat effluent prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality guidelines or regulations. Alternatively, if privately owned, off-site, treatment facilities are out of compliance, create a strategy to address the issue and report on progress at recertification. Gold level: For government owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), treat effluent prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality guidelines or regulations. Alternatively, if government owned off-site treatment facilities are out of compliance, create a strategy to address the issue. Gold level recertification: For off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (both private and government owned, if any), implement the Silver or Gold level strategy (as applicable) to address any issues with off-site treatment facility compliance. Facilities discharging effluent directly to surface or groundwater must comply with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any), international, or industry best practice effluent quality guidelines for direct discharge. (Note: Facilities discharging via a sewer system that does not route to an effluent treatment facility with at least secondary treatment capabilities or equivalent are discharging directly to surface or groundwater for the purposes of this requirement.) For the Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities meeting this requirement based on regulatory compliance, the parameters addressed in the permit must also be consistent with leading regulations, international guidelines, or industry best practice. Leading regulations are defined as those that include a functioning mechanism through which water quality-based limits are set. Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to an off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., publicly owned treatment works, central effluent treatment plant, or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must comply with required pretreatment limits, if any. For the Silver level: Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to a privately owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., central effluent treatment plant or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must demonstrate that the treatment facility is treating the effluent received to quality standards in line with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any) or international guidelines. If the off-site treatment facility is out of compliance, the issue must be addressed by recertification at the Gold level (see Gold level section that follows). For the Gold level: Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to a government owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., publicly owned treatment works or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must demonstrate that the treatment facility is treating the effluent received to quality standards in line with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any) or international guidelines. If the off-site treatment facility is out of compliance, the issue must be addressed by recertification at the Gold level. Methods of addressing the issue may include demonstrating that the manufacturing facility is not contributing to the issue, the manufacturing facility is complying with regional regulatory (if any), international, or industry best practice effluent quality guidelines for direct discharge, moving the manufacturing plant, or demonstrating that the third party has corrected the issue. Effluent testing When effluent must be tested for verification purposes, sampling and testing must be conducted according to the methods specified by regulatory permits, the off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility, and/or other guidelines as relevant. The analytical laboratory conducting the tests must be accredited or certified for the specific analysis per ISO 17025, NELAP, or equivalent. 7.8 Transparency IntendedOutcome(s) Water use and effluent quality data for final manufacturing stage facilities are available to stakeholders, demonstrating the manufacturer’s commitment to water stewardship. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver and Platinum Requirement(s) Silver level: Make water use data for final manufacturing stage facilities available to stakeholders. Platinum level: Make effluent quality data for the final manufacturing stage facilities available to stakeholders. ---- The data must include: 1. For the Silver through Platinum levels, withdrawals by source and stress level, consumption, and discharge by level of treatment and destination. 2. For the Platinum level, effluent quality test reports as required for verification of the Effluent Quality Compliance requirements (see Section 7.2). 7.10 Optimizing Effluent and Sludge Quality at the Facility Level Intended Outcome(s) Effluent and sludge at final manufacturing facilities are managed with the aim of protecting local water quality and ecosystem health. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Platinum Requirement(s) For the final manufacturing stage facilities: • Establish a comprehensive effluent and sludge quality management system, and • Optimize the effluent and sludge produced as a result of all manufacturing processes used at the facility. Optimizing Effluent and SludgeQuality 1. For conventional water quality parameters, facility(ies) releasing effluent directly to surface or groundwater (defined in Section 7.2) must comply with the more stringent of the limitations indicated by either their permits or as follows: a. pH: 6-9 b. Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD): 25 mg/L c. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): 100 mg/L d. Total Suspended Solids (TSS): 30 mg/L e. Ammonia (as N): 10 mg/L f. Total nitrogen: 10 mg/L g. Total phosphorus: 2.0 mg/L h. Temperature: < 3 °C increase i. Color: 7 m-1 (436 nm; yellow) 5 m-1 (525 nm; red) 3 m-1 (620 nm; blue) j. Oil and grease: 10 mg/L k. Coliform: 400 bacteria/100 ml
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu Abwasserqualität und Abwasseraufbereitung?
-
Wassernutzung
-
Materialeinsatz
-
Fasern
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien für die Herstellung von Naturfasern?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Die Fasern werden stichprobenartig auf Rückstände von Agrochemikalien untersucht UND gefährliche Pestizide, wie in den Leitlinien beschrieben, sind verboten. (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Mindestens 51 % der Fasern sind bio oder in der Umstellung zu bio (nicht bio Naturfasern müssen auf Rückstände von Agrochemikalien untersucht werden). (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations Intended Outcome(s) In alignment with leading regulations that aim to protect human health and the environment, the use of well-known toxic chemicals in the product is avoided. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) The product complies with leading chemical regulations. Note: In addition to the chemical restrictions in this section, products seeking certification are also subject to the applicable chemical restrictions in Sections 4.2 and 4.6. 4.3 Material and Chemical Inventory Intended Outcome(s) An increasing percentage of the product’s material and chemical composition is known so that possible risks the materials and chemicals may pose to human health and the environment can be assessed and strategies for using safer chemistry can be developed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum Requirement(s) Bronze level: Characterize all homogeneous materials in the product by concentration and generic material type or category/name. In addition, fully define the chemical composition of products that are released directly into the biosphere as part of their intended use (e.g., soaps, paints). For other product types, collect the chemical composition information necessary to assess at least 75% of the product. Further Explanation Generic Material Type The generic material type is the descriptor of the material that would be included in commercial descriptions, technical manuals, or on bills of materials (e.g., aluminum, polyethylene, steel, wood, cotton, adhesive, paint). Wherever possible, the most specific descriptor known and/or the trade name of the material should also be reported (e.g., 6061 aluminum, DOWLEX™ polyethylene, 304 stainless steel, oak wood, GOTS-certified cotton, Prismatic “INK BLACK” powder coat, 3M Super 77 Spray Adhesive, etc.) as this will facilitate information collection for the higher-level Material Health requirements. ---- Characterizing Materials in the Product The concentration of each material as a percentage of the total product weight must be determined. Fully Defining the Chemical Composition of Materials Toxicological assessment of a material requires disclosure of its full chemical composition from the supplier(s)/formulator(s) controlling the chemical composition. A homogeneous material is considered fully defined when the chemical names and chemical identifiers are known for all chemicals subject to review. Required Documentation [...] • Analytical testing reports demonstrating that any Section 4.1 restricted substances with the potential for being present in the material are below relevant restriction limits o Test reports must be conducted within two years prior to the start of the application. o Biological, geological, and recycled content materials require both analytical testing and a Regulatory Compliance Declaration or regulatory statement of compliance. Analytical testing for these materials does not include all Section 4.1 restricted substances. o If a biological, geological, or recycled content material does not contain any intentionally added inputs (e.g., additives, finishes, coatings, pesticides) or known contaminants, the supplier may provide a statement attesting as such in lieu of providing a Regulatory Compliance declaration or statement of compliance. For exempt metallic components (as defined per Section 4.3 Material and Chemical Inventory), the following is required: • Evidence of Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) compliance. For textile chemical formulations (e.g., a textile dye formulation), a ZDHC ChemCheck report or equivalent report or declaration verifying ZDHC MRSL compliance may be used to demonstrate Section 4.1 compliance. The report or declaration must demonstrate conformance to ZDHC level 1 at a minimum. If this compliance pathway is used, a Regulatory Compliance declaration is not required.
Referenzdokumente:
4 // Material Health Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard spezifische Kriterien für verschiedene Arten von synthetischen Fasern (einschließlich künstlicher Zellulosefasern)?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Nicht anwendbar (für Systeme, die weniger als 10% synthetische Fasern enthalten) (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Der Standard formuliert spezifische Kriterien für die nachhaltige Produktion von Kunstfasern ODER behandelt die nachhaltige Beschaffung von Kunstfasern. (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
4.1 Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations Intended Outcome(s) In alignment with leading regulations that aim to protect human health and the environment, the use of well-known toxic chemicals in the product is avoided. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) The product complies with leading chemical regulations. Note: In addition to the chemical restrictions in this section, products seeking certification are also subject to the applicable chemical restrictions in Sections 4.2 and 4.6. ---- The product and its homogeneous materials subject to review comply with leading chemical regulations, as defined by the applicable Bronze level regulatory restrictions in the Cradle to Cradle Certified® Restricted Substances reference document. The Bronze level regulatory restrictions include restrictions that apply to all products, restrictions that apply to children’s toy products, and restrictions that apply to cosmetics and personal care products. See Section 4.3 for more information on how to define homogeneous materials subject to review in a product seeking certification. For textile chemical formulations, the product may alternatively comply with the most recent version of the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC) Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL) or equivalent. Further Explanation Pathways to Demonstrate Compliance with Leading Chemical Regulations [...] 4. Material Health Assessor Verification (alternate compliance pathway for suppliers who are unable to sign ANY Regulatory Compliance Declaration): • For this pathway, suppliers provide a signed and attested Version 4.1 Supplier Bill of Materials Form indicating that the composition information is complete and represents all intentional inputs and known contaminants to the Cradle to Cradle Certified Material Health Assessor, who reviews the composition, confirms regulatory compliance, and signs the C2CPII Supplier Regulatory Compliance Declaration. • For this pathway, the supplier can provide a signed and attested Bill of Materials using: o C2CPII Version 4.0 or Version 4.1 Supplier Bill of Materials Form OR, o A Bill of Materials form in the supplier’s own format. Note that the supplier Bill of Materials must include the same information requested in C2CPII’s Bill of Materials. [...] Defining Homogeneous Materials Subject to Section 4.1 Restrictions Substances listed on the Section 4.1 spreadsheet tabs in the Cradle to Cradle Certified® Restricted Substances reference document are restricted in all homogeneous materials subject to review. Homogeneous materials are defined as materials of uniform composition throughout that cannot be mechanically disjointed, in principle, into different materials. Examples of homogeneous materials are polypropylene, steel, shampoo, glass cleaner, nylon yarn, finish, and coating. Examples of nonhomogeneous materials are powder-coated steel, a printed bottle label, plywood, laminate, and chair casters. Additional detail regarding the homogeneous material definition as well as interpretations regarding how to apply it to specific product and materials can be found in the Methodology for Defining Homogeneous Materials. [...] Required Documentation [...] For textile chemical formulations (e.g., a textile dye formulation), a ZDHC ChemCheck report or equivalent report or declaration verifying ZDHC MRSL compliance may be used to demonstrate Section 4.1 compliance. The report or declaration must demonstrate conformance to ZDHC level 1 at a minimum. If this compliance pathway is used, a Regulatory Compliance declaration is not required.
Referenzdokumente:
4 // Material Health Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Verwendung von recycelten Materialien?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Verwendung von recyceltem Material in der Verpackung (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Verwendung von recyceltem Material im Produkt (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
5.3 Increasing Demand: Incorporating Cycled and/or Renewable Content Intended Outcome(s) Demand for circularly sourced materials is increased as a result of the increased use of cycled or renewable materials in the product, helping to close the loop and advance the circular economy. Negative impacts of virgin material use are also minimized. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum Requirement(s) Bronze level: For select commonly cycled product and material types, incorporate the required percentage of cycled and/or renewable content into the product using an approved method. Alternatively, publicly disclose an explanation of the limitation(s) preventing achievement of the required minimums. Silver level: Incorporate a percentage of cycled and/or renewable content into the product equal to or greater than industry averages and/or consistent with common practice. Develop a plan for increasing the use of post-consumer recycled and/or responsibly sourced renewable content, and demonstrate progress toward achieving the plan at recertification. Alternatively, publicly disclose an explanation of the limitation(s) preventing achievement of the required percentage(s). Further Explanation Developing a Plan and Demonstrating Progress At the Silver level it is required to Develop a plan for increasing the use of post-consumer recycled and/or responsibly sourced renewable content and demonstrate progress toward achieving the plan at recertification. At a minimum, the plan for increasing the use of post-consumer recycled and/or responsibly sourced renewable content must include the type and source of content intended to be included or increased in the product, a timeline with targets for increasing the content, and a method for achieving these increases. A plan is also required at the Gold level, but not at the Platinum level, because the technically feasible maximum amount of cycled content is required at Platinum. A progress report on achieving the plan must be provided at recertification and action towards achieving it must have occurred. Ideally this will have resulted in an increased amount of cycled or responsibly sourced renewable content in the product. However, other actions towards achieving that goal also receive credit. Examples of progress include: • Using an increased amount of cycled and/or responsibly sourced renewable content in the product. • Conducting research and development activities aimed at removing barriers to using an increased amount of cycled content. This type of research may be necessary (for example) when technical specifications or Material Health requirements make the use of recycled content difficult. In this case, progress may require conducting performance tests of products containing cycled materials to determine if the required technical specifications can be maintained when cycled content is used. • Actions taken to increase the available supply of cycled and/or responsibly sourced renewable content available for use. For example, investments that support development of new cycling technologies, investments to increase local recovery and processing capacity or improved sorting capability, or (for renewable material) financial or in-kind support of supplier(s) efforts to obtain a responsible sourcing certification. Note that progress is required at recertification.
Referenzdokumente:
5 // Product Circularity Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für die Verwendung von genetisch veränderten Organismen (GVO)?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Verwendung mit angemessenen Kontrollen zur Verhinderung von Kontaminationen zulassen (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Verwendung verbieten (2 Punkte)
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien für die Herstellung von Naturfasern?
-
Fasern
-
Qualität
-
Qualität und Gebrauchstauglichkeit
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Qualität von Textilien?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Less than four aspects are tested textile (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: All four aspects (fastness of rubbing/ perspiration/ light/ washing) are tested (2 Punkte)
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Qualität von Textilien?
-
Qualität und Gebrauchstauglichkeit
-
Energie & Klima
-
Klimaschutz
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zum Energieverbrauch in der Herstellungsphase?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Überwachung des Energieverbrauchs im Zeitverlauf (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Verbrauchsreduzierung, Effizienzsteigerung ODER verstärkte Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
6.2 Quantifying Electricity Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intended Outcome(s) Electricity use and greenhouse gas emissions associated with final manufacturing and the product’s embodied greenhouse gas emissions have been quantified and verified, creating a baseline against which reductions can be measured, and helping to identify areas for improvement. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum Requirement(s) Bronze level: Quantify annual electricity use and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the final manufacturing stage of the product. Silver level: For construction products and building materials used to construct primary building elements (i.e., products for which life cycle assessment is common practice), quantify the embodied greenhouse gas emissions associated with the product from resource extraction through final manufacturing or end of use, and produce an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) that has been critically reviewed by a third-party. Gold level: For other product types, quantify the embodied greenhouse gas emissions associated with the product from resource extraction through final manufacturing or end of use and, if self-reported, conduct an internal review. Platinum level: For all product types, conduct a third-party critical review of the quantification of embodied greenhouse gas emissions associated with the product from resource extraction through end of use and produce an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD).
Referenzdokumente:
6 // Clean Air & Climate Protection Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zum Energieverbrauch in der Herstellungsphase?
-
Klimaschutz
-
Abfall & Luftverschmutzung
-
Abfallmanagement
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen an das Abfallvolumen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Verringerung des Abfallvolumens (1 Punkt)
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien zu giftigem Abfall?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Reduce and/or treat toxic waste (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für die Wiederverwendung oder das Recycling von Abfällen vor Ort?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
3.2.4 Strategy for Environmental Policy Implementation Intended Outcome(s) A framework for monitoring and measuring progress toward achievement of environmental performance targets and for identifying areas for improvement is established. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Cradle to Cradle Certified 14 ® Product Standard Version 4.0 User Guidance Further Explanation Priority Risks and Opportunities (Requirement #1): At a minimum, the strategy is expected to focus on the priorities determined per the risk and opportunity assessment (see Section 3.2.1). Time-bound Performance and Impact Objectives (Requirement #2): The specific objectives and related targets included in the strategy will depend on the priority action areas identified in requirement #1. Examples of performance objectives and related targets include: • Consistent compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations at all final manufacturing facilities with a target of zero instances of permit exceedance • Minimizing waste with a related target to increase recycling of manufacturing ‘waste’ by a certain percentage within a designated timeframe 5 // Product Circularity Requirements Category Intent Products are intentionally designed for their next use and are actively cycled in their intended cycling pathway(s). 5.4: ≥ 50% of materials by weight are compatible with the intended cycling pathway(s) (i.e., recyclable, compostable, or biodegradable). - Bronze, Gold, Silver, Platinum 5.2: Partnerships for cycling (recovery and processing) of the product have been initiated. If the product is intended for cycling via municipal systems, materials are compatible with those systems. - Gold, Silver, Platinum 5.3: Percentage of cycled and/or renewable content, by weight, is equal to or higher than industry averages and/or is consistent with common practice. Alternative: Limitations that prevent achievement of this requirement are publicly reported. - Gold, Silver, Platinum 5.4: ≥ 70% of materials by weight are compatible with the intended cycling pathway(s) (i.e., recyclable, compostable, or biodegradable).
Referenzdokumente:
3 // General Requirements 5 // Product Circularity Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zum Abfallmanagement in der Herstellungsphase?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.2 Effluent Quality Compliance Intended Outcome(s) Final manufacturing stage facilities are in compliance with regulatory and/or industry best practice effluent limitations -Bronze, Silver, and Gold 7.7 Assessing and Optimizing Product-Relevant Chemicals in Effluent and Sludge Intended Outcome(s) - Bronze, Silver, Gold and Platinum Chemicals entering receiving waters and soils as a result of product manufacturing have been intentionally selected based on their preferred safety attributes. 7.10 Optimizing Effluent and Sludge Quality at the Facility Level Intended Outcome(s) Effluent and sludge at final manufacturing facilities are managed with the aim of protecting local water quality and ecosystem health. - Platinum
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Abfalltrennung?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
5.4 Material Compatibility for Technical and/or Biological Cycles Intended Outcome(s) Product materials with the highest capacity for biological and/or technical cycling have been intentionally selected, increasing the likelihood that such materials will retain their value and move through subsequent cycles of use. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum [...] For a material to count toward the percentage of materials compatible with the intended cycling pathway(s) the following conditions must be met: 1. Homogeneous materials that need to be separated in order to be cycled must be separable by the entity implementing the intended cycling pathway with given instructions and no additional special knowledge. 2. For products that are installed prior to use (e.g., in a building, a vehicle, or fixed within a sidewalk), it must be possible to extract the product from the installed location. 3. For products and materials intended for technical municipal cycling (i.e., municipal recycling), the product and/or material must be compatible for municipal cycling systems (e.g., painted plastics and plastic laminated paper are not currently compatible for municipal recycling).
Referenzdokumente:
5 // Product Circularity Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur sicheren Entsorgung von gefährlichem Abfall?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
3.2.2 Assessing Environmental Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of environmental risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Identify environmental risks and opportunities for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities and for the certified product. ---- The following issues are de facto high risk for final manufacturing stage facilities or for the product, as noted in the scenarios below: [...] h. Waste generation is a high-risk issue for: i. Final manufacturing stage facilities in countries with highly inadequate waste management. This is defined as countries with open dumps. ii. Final manufacturing stage facilities for which hazardous waste is regulated per the corresponding regional regulatory permitting system (e.g., for facilities required to hold hazardous waste permits). In regions where hazardous waste is not regulated, any facility
Referenzdokumente:
3 // General Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu unkontrollierter Abfallverbrennung am Standort?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Verbot der Abfallverbrennung (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
5.7 Product Designed for Disassembly Intended Outcome(s) The product may be easily disassembled into discrete materials compatible for its intended cycling pathway(s) making it more likely that a large percentage of the materials in the product will be cycled. [...] Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver, Gold, and Platinum [,...] For the Silver level, the plan for increasing the ease of product disassembly must include at least one of the design or communication elements required at the Gold level. For the Gold and Platinum levels, the following design and communications elements define “ease of disassembly” and are required as applicable for ≥ 90% (for Gold) and ≥ 99% (for Platinum) of materials by weight: 2. Processes that result in the loss of specific materials in the product in order to recover other materials (e.g., burning plastics to recover metals) must be avoided.
Referenzdokumente:
5 // Product Circularity Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu unkontrollierter Deponierung von Abfällen?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Prohibit waste landfilling (1 Punkt)
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Behandlung oder Entsorgung von Abfall durch Dritte?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Keep records on third party contractors (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.2 Effluent Quality Compliance [...] For the Bronze level: [...] Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to an off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., publicly owned treatment works, central effluent treatment plant, or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must comply with required pretreatment limits, if any. For the Silver level: Final manufacturing stage facilities discharging process effluent to a privately owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facility (e.g., central effluent treatment plant or wastewater treatment plant) with at least secondary treatment must demonstrate that the treatment facility is treating the effluent received to quality standards in line with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any) or international guidelines.
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen an das Abfallvolumen?
-
Luftverschmutzung (exkl. Treibhausgase) & Immissionen
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen zu Luftverschmutzung?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Überwachung der Emissionen (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: End-of-Pipe-Technologie (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
3.2.2 Assessing Environmental Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of environmental risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Identify environmental risks and opportunities for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities and for the certified product. The risk and opportunity assessment must include: 1. A company-level risk assessment, based on conducting desk research at a minimum, to identify known and likely environmental risks associated with the applicant company’s own operations, final manufacturing facilities, the product’s supply chain, product use, product cycling and end of use, relevant communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders. The following issues are de facto high risk for all large companies (defined as companies with ≥ 250,000 employees) and potentially high risk for all other companies: [...] b. Environmental pollution (air, fresh and marine water, soil), [...] The following issues are de facto high risk for final manufacturing stage facilities or for the product, as noted in the scenarios below: e. Air pollution is a high-risk issue for: i. Final manufacturing stage facilities with on-site combustion power plants (including biomass combustion). ii. Final manufacturing stage facilities at which processes commonly known to be airpollutant-intense take place. This includes (but is not limited to): Smelting metals, refining oil, producing cement, using high volumes of organic solvents, and incinerating waste. 6.1 Air Emissions Compliance Intended Outcome(s) The final manufacturing stage facilities where the product is manufactured are in compliance with regulatory and/or industry best practice air emissions limitations. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Facilities must comply with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any), international, or industry best practice air emissions guidelines. Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, including compliance with regional regulatory air emissions limitations, is required as a baseline. For final manufacturing stage facilities meeting this requirement based on regulatory compliance, the parameters addressed in the permit must also be consistent with leading regulations, international guidelines, or industry best practice. Leading regulations are defined as those that include a functioning mechanism through which ambient air quality-based limits are set (i.e., assessment of the existing ambient air quality is used to inform and set the permitted limits with the goal of maintaining high quality standards).
Referenzdokumente:
3 // General Requirements 6 // Clean Air & Climate Protection Requirements
-
Für welche Produktionsphase enthält der Standard Anforderungen zu Luftverschmutzung?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Restrictions on air pollution for some of the production steps (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
6.1 Air Emissions Compliance Intended Outcome(s) The final manufacturing stage facilities where the product is manufactured are in compliance with regulatory and/or industry best practice air emissions limitations. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Final manufacturing stage facilities comply with air emissions regulations or guidelines. ---- Facilities must comply with the corresponding regional regulatory (if any), international, or industry best practice air emissions guidelines. Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, including compliance with regional regulatory air emissions limitations, is required as a baseline. For final manufacturing stage facilities meeting this requirement based on regulatory compliance, the parameters addressed in the permit must also be consistent with leading regulations, international guidelines, or industry best practice. Leading regulations are defined as those that include a functioning mechanism through which ambient air quality-based limits are set (i.e., assessment of the existing ambient air quality is used to inform and set the permitted limits with the goal of maintaining high quality standards).
Referenzdokumente:
6 // Clean Air & Climate Protection Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen zu Luftverschmutzung?
-
Abfallmanagement
-
Umweltmanagement
-
Umweltmanagement
-
Beinhaltet der Standard ein allgemeines Kriterium zur Einhaltung aller relevanten lokalen, regionalen und nationalen Umweltgesetze und -vorschriften?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
2.1 Products Eligible for Certification [...] Further Explanation The following product types are not eligible for Cradle to Cradle certification: [...] 3. Products that are not in compliance with applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. 3.2.4 Strategy for Environmental Policy Implementation Intended Outcome(s) A framework for monitoring and measuring progress toward achievement of environmental performance targets and for identifying areas for improvement is established. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Develop a strategy for implementing the environmental policy and report on implementation progress at each recertification. ---- Further Explanation The requirements in this section apply to the applicant company. [...] Time-bound Performance and Impact Objectives (Requirement #2): The specific objectives and related targets included in the strategy will depend on the priority action areas identified in requirement #1. Examples of performance objectives and related targets include: • Consistent compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations at all final manufacturing facilities with a target of zero instances of permit exceedance.
Referenzdokumente:
2 // Product Eligibility
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Anforderungen, die sicherstellen, dass relevante und aktuelle Genehmigungen vorliegen (z. B. Wassernutzungsrechte oder Landnutzungstitel)?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Requirements Summary To achieve a desired level within the category, the requirements at all lower levels must also be met. 7.2: Final manufacturing facilities comply with water quality regulations or guidelines (i.e., permits, international guidelines, or industry best practice). Data to demonstrate the compliance status of off-site, independently operated, effluent treatment facilities (if any) are requested. (Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum) 7.2: Privately owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), comply with effluent quality guidelines or regulations. Alternatively, a strategy to address the issue has been developed. (Silver, Gold, Platinum) 7.2 Effluent Quality Compliance Intended Outcome(s) Final manufacturing stage facilities are in compliance with regulatory and/or industry best practice effluent limitations. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For the final manufacturing stage, treat effluent (either on- or off-site) prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality regulations or guidelines. For off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), request data that will demonstrate if the facility is complying with all applicable laws and regulations. Silver level: For privately owned, off-site, independently operated effluent treatment facilities (if any), treat effluent prior to discharge to the environment and adhere to effluent quality guidelines or regulations. Alternatively, if privately owned, off-site, treatment facilities are out of compliance, create a strategy to address the issue and report on progress at recertification. 7.10 Optimizing Effluent and Sludge Quality at the Facility Level Intended Outcome(s) Effluent and sludge at final manufacturing facilities are managed with the aim of protecting local water quality and ecosystem health. [...] Optimizing Effluent and SludgeQuality 1. For conventional water quality parameters, facility(ies) releasing effluent directly to surface or groundwater (defined in Section 7.2) must comply with the more stringent of the limitations indicated by either their permits or as follows: [...] Applicants who would be required to comply with effluent limits more stringent than what indicated by their permits may alternatively publicly disclose an explanation of the conditions and/or trade-offs preventing the facility from meeting the more stringent limits. Note: For the Bronze level: 3. If identified, the following issues of high concern must be resolved prior to certification or recertification: [...] e. Missing or deficient permits (i.e., business license, building permit, and environmental permit(s) if required by local regulations),
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Minderung negativer Auswirkungen auf die Umwelt vor Aufnahme der Produktion / den Arbeiten?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
3.2.1 Environmental Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant company has formally committed to protecting the environment through company policy approved at the executive level. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to protecting the environment through company policy. ---- The policy or policies must: 1. Establish expectations for the applicant company, the supply chain, communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders. 2. Include the company’s commitment to address any high-risk environmental issues identified via the risk assessment, including any de facto high-risk issues. (If no high-risk issues were identified, the policy may address environmental protection in a general way.) 3. Define staff responsibilities for implementation. 4. Be formally approved by a duly empowered officer of the applicant company or by the Board of Directors. 3.2.2 Assessing Environmental Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of environmental risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Identify environmental risks and opportunities for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities and for the certified product. ---- The risk and opportunity assessment must include: [...] 3.2.3 Monitor & Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on protecting the environment is monitored and verified for tier 1 suppliers, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that environmental risks are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver Requirement(s) Request data measuring performance against the environmental policy from tier 1 suppliers associated with high-risk issues as identified per the risk assessment. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations.
Referenzdokumente:
3 // General Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Bewertung der Umweltrisiken und der Auswirkungen der Produktion / Aktivitäten, bevor Geschäftstätigkeit / Anbau und Infrastruktur beträchtlich verstärkt oder ausgebaut werden?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Referenzdokumente:
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für die Einbeziehung von Interessengruppen zur Erreichung von Umweltzielen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
3.2.6 Environmental Management Systems Intended Outcome(s) An environmental performance management system is in place, ensuring that environmental performance of the applicant company and product is improved over time. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver and Gold Requirement(s) Silver level: For the applicant company and for all final manufacturing stage facility(ies), implement management system(s) that support achievement of the environmental policy commitments within company and facility operations. Gold level: Implement a responsible sourcing management system that supports achievement of the environmental policy commitments within the product’s supply chain. [...] 8.6 Management Systems Intended Outcome(s) A management system for people and procedures is in place, ensuring that necessary corrective actions are taken, actions are effective, and that performance on respecting human rights is ultimately improved. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver and Gold Requirement(s) Silver level: Implement a management system that supports achievement of the human rights policy commitments within company operations. Gold level: Implement a responsible sourcing management system that supports achievement of the human rights policy commitments within the product’s supply chain. [...]
Referenzdokumente:
3 // General Requirements 8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard ein allgemeines Kriterium zur Einhaltung aller relevanten lokalen, regionalen und nationalen Umweltgesetze und -vorschriften?
-
Umweltmanagement
Sozialverträglichkeit 59%
-
Vereinigungsfreiheit (ILO 87)
-
Kollektivverhandlungen (ILO 98)
-
Arbeitsverträge
-
Arbeitnehmendenvertretungen bei gesetzlich eingeschränkter Vereinigungsfreiheit
-
Zwangsarbeitsverbot (ILO 29+105)
-
Verbot der Schuldknechtschaft
-
Verbot der Einbehaltung persönlicher Dokumente (z.B. Pass)
-
Bewegungsfreiheit
-
Mindestalter (ILO 138)
-
Verifizierung des Alters
-
Verbot der schlimmsten Formen der Kinderarbeit (ILO 182)
-
Gleiche Entlohnung (ILO 100)
-
Mutterschutz
-
Diskriminierungsverbot (ILO 111)
-
Rechtmäßigkeit des Unternehmens
-
Zahlung des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns
-
Geregelte Arbeitszeiten
-
Rechte und Leistungen für Subunternehmer
-
Verbot der Belästigung und Misshandlung
-
Bedingungen am Arbeitsplatz
-
Zugang zu Trinkwasser
-
Verbesserte Sanitäreinrichtungen
-
Gebäudesicherheit
-
Vorbereitung auf Brandfälle
-
Notfall- und Evakuierungssicherheit
-
Gesundheit und Sicherheit am Arbeitsplatz/ ILO 155
-
Unternehmerische Verantwortung
-
Verlangt der Standard Maßnahmen, die auf die Schaffung gleicher wirtschaftlicher Chancen für Frauen und Männer abzielen?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien zur Bewertung der Auswirkungen der Geschäftstätigkeit auf die Menschenrechte?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Menschenrechtliche Sorgfaltspflicht ODER soziale Sorgfaltspflicht (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Menschenrechtliche Sorgfaltspflicht UND soziale Sorgfaltspflicht (2 Punkte)
-
Verlangt der Standard Maßnahmen, die auf die Schaffung gleicher wirtschaftlicher Chancen für Frauen und Männer abzielen?
-
Arbeiterrechte
-
ILO Kernarbeitsnormen
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Vereinigungsfreiheit und das Organisationsrecht gemäß ILO 87?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: [...] 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] f. Freedom of association and collective bargaining, Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance Definition of Human Rights Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination (https://www.un.org/en/globalissues/human-rights). Internationally recognized human rights are defined in the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, codified through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), as well as the eight International Labor Organization (ILO) Core Conventions set out in the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. The ILO Core Conventions are: • Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87)
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für das Recht auf Kollektivverhandlungen gemäß ILO 98?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: [...] 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] f. Freedom of association and collective bargaining, Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance Definition of Human Rights Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination (https://www.un.org/en/globalissues/human-rights). Internationally recognized human rights are defined in the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, codified through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), as well as the eight International Labor Organization (ILO) Core Conventions set out in the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. The ILO Core Conventions are: [...] • Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98)
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Verbietet der Standard Zwangsarbeit gemäß ILO 29 und 105?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. The policy must: 1. Establish human rights expectations for the applicant company, the supply chain, communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders. 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): c. Elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labor, or activities that are known to lead to forced labor (e.g., human trafficking), Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance e Further Explanation Definition of Human Rights Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination (https://www.un.org/en/globalissues/human-rights). Internationally recognized human rights are defined in the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, codified through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), as well as the eight International Labor Organization (ILO) Core Conventions set out in the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. The ILO Core Conventions are: • Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) • Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) • Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) and its 2014 Protocol • Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105) • Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138) • Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182) • Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100) • Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111) • Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155) • Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für das Verbot von Kinderarbeit gemäß ILO 138?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: [...] 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] d. The abolition of child labor and adequate protections for workers above the legal working age and below age 18, [...] Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities [...] Further Explanation Definition of Human Rights Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination (https://www.un.org/en/globalissues/human-rights). Internationally recognized human rights are defined in the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, codified through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), as well as the eight International Labor Organization (ILO) Core Conventions set out in the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. The ILO Core Conventions are: [...] • Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138)
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Prävention der schlimmsten Formen von Kinderarbeit gemäß ILO 182?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: [...] 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] d. The abolition of child labor and adequate protections for workers above the legal working age and below age 18, [...] Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities [...] Further Explanation Definition of Human Rights Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination (https://www.un.org/en/globalissues/human-rights). Internationally recognized human rights are defined in the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, codified through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), as well as the eight International Labor Organization (ILO) Core Conventions set out in the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. The ILO Core Conventions are: [...] • Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182)
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Zahlung gleicher Löhne gemäß ILO-Konvention 100?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of human rights risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: • Assess human rights risks and identify opportunities for improvement for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities, and tier 1 suppliers. (Note: Tier 1 suppliers are defined as suppliers to the final manufacturing stage, including in cases where the applicant is using contract manufacturing.) • Demonstrate ongoing efforts to improve visibility and assess risks within the certified product’s supply chain (i.e., beyond tier 1). Gold level: Assess human rights risks and identify opportunities for improvement associated with the product’s components and raw materials (regardless of supply chain tier). Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance Further Explanation Definition of Human Rights Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination (https://www.un.org/en/globalissues/human-rights). Internationally recognized human rights are defined in the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, codified through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), as well as the eight International Labor Organization (ILO) Core Conventions set out in the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. The ILO Core Conventions are: [...] • Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100) 8.11 Fostering a Culture of Social Fairness Intended Outcome(s) Socially fair business practices in its governance and management approach are applied by the applicant company. This is reflected by a diverse, inclusive, and engaged workforce and through training, remuneration, and payment of a living wage. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Platinum Requirement(s) Foster a diverse, inclusive, and engaged work environment in which social fairness operates as a core part of recruitment, training, remuneration, performance evaluation, and incentive structures. ---- The following are required: [...] 4. Social performance indicators must include ethnicity-, race-, sex- and age-disaggregated data on hiring, compensation, promotion, demotion, training and mentoring for employees of all levels. Exception: If applicable local laws do not permit collection of all or a portion of the required data, the pertinent portion of the requirement is waived. 5. Data must be evaluated for pay equity, including a comparison of the average wages by ethnicity, race, and gender for work of equal value, and the ratio of the compensation of the CEO or equivalent to the median and average wage of a full-time worker. The exception noted in #4 applies. 6. Pay equity data must be published externally and made publicly accessible. An explanation of differences that may be realized or quantified over time must be included. The exception noted in #4 applies.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Nichtdiskriminierung am Arbeitsplatz gemäß ILO Konvention 111?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. The policy must: 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): a. Elimination of discrimination with respect to employment and occupation including, but not limited to, ethnicity-, race- and gender-based discrimination Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities [...] Further Explanation Definition of Human Rights Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination (https://www.un.org/en/globalissues/human-rights). Internationally recognized human rights are defined in the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, codified through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), as well as the eight International Labor Organization (ILO) Core Conventions set out in the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. The ILO Core Conventions are: • Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) • Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) • Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) and its 2014 Protocol • Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105) • Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138) • Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182) • Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100) • Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111) • Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155) • Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu Gesundheit und Sicherheit am Arbeitsplatz gemäß ILO 155?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Teilweile erfüllt nach ILO 155 (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Vollständig erfüllt nach ILO 155 (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: 1. Establish human rights expectations for the applicant company, the supply chain, communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders. 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] g. Safe and healthy work, including: i. Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), ii. Emergency preparation and response, iii. Hazardous materials handling procedures, iv. Management systems that address health and safety risks, and v. Appropriate building construction, electrical, and fire safety. h. Provision of the legal minimum wage and all legally mandated benefits including employer contributions for social security benefits and services, Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities [...] Further Explanation Definition of Human Rights Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination (https://www.un.org/en/globalissues/human-rights). Internationally recognized human rights are defined in the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, codified through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), as well as the eight International Labor Organization (ILO) Core Conventions set out in the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. The ILO Core Conventions are: • Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) • Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) • Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) and its 2014 Protocol • Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105) • Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138) • Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182) • Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100) • Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111) • Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155) • Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Vereinigungsfreiheit und das Organisationsrecht gemäß ILO 87?
-
Arbeitnehmerrechte
-
Sonstige Arbeitnehmerrechte
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Bildung von Arbeitnehmendenvertretungen, wenn die Vereinigungsfreiheit gesetzlich eingeschränkt ist?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Erlaubt (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Gefördert (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Assessing Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of human rights risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze and Gold Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities Further Explanation [...] Additional Guidance: Obtaining a Deeper Understanding of Human Rights Issues [...] • Considering the nuances of freedom of association and collective bargaining in locations where the relevant ILO Core Conventions C087 and C098 (respectively) have not been ratified – this applies to countries such as Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates – where trade unions are banned completely; and in China and Vietnam, where unions are government controlled and not independent. If ILO member states have not ratified either of these Core Conventions, they are still bound to uphold freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining through the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. [...]
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zu den Beschwerdemechanismen für Arbeitnehmer?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.7 Grievance Mechanisms Intended Outcome(s) A mechanism is in place by which employees, customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders may safely report negative effects of business activities and operations and other social fairness concerns to the company in order to obtain redress for those impacts. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver and Gold Requirement(s) Silver level: Provide a grievance mechanism that permits company employees and other stakeholders to obtain redress for negative human rights impacts. For any contract final manufacturing stage facilities, request that a grievance mechanism be made available. Gold level: For contract final manufacturing stage facilities, ensure that a grievance mechanism is available that permits employees and other stakeholders to obtain redress for negative human rights impacts. For the Silver and Gold levels, the applicant company must have a grievance mechanism for company employees and other stakeholders that: 1. Is supported by a non-retaliation policy. 2. Is capable of addressing the risks to and potential adverse impacts on people. 3. Addresses concerns promptly, using an understandable and transparent process based on local best practices that is readily accessible by any affected stakeholder. 4. Provides feedback to those concerned, without their risking retribution. 5. Includes informing direct employees about the mechanism at the time of hire. 6. Does not impede or preclude access to judicial or administrative remedies that might be available under law or through existing arbitration procedures, or substitute for grievance mechanisms provided through collective agreements. 7. Includes written records and periodic reviews to identify and make necessary improvements. For the Gold level, the grievance mechanism may be provided by the contract manufacturer or by the applicant.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen an die Einführung von Strategien oder Verfahren zur Einhaltung grundlegender Arbeitnehmerrechte am Arbeitsplatz?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.4 Strategy for Policy Implementation Intended Outcome(s) A framework for monitoring and measuring progress toward achievement of social performance targets and for identifying areas for improvement is established. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Develop a strategy for implementing the human rights policy and report on implementation progress at each recertification. ---- The strategy must: 1. Address priority risks and opportunities (per Section 8.2). 2. Include specific time-bound performance and impact objectives to guide decision making. 3. Define the scope of implementation. 4. Define the company’s human, technical, and material resource allocation for implementation.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen zur Information der Arbeitnehmer*innen über ihre Arbeitsrechte?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.6 Management Systems Intended Outcome(s) A management system for people and procedures is in place, ensuring that necessary corrective actions are taken, actions are effective, and that performance on respecting human rights is ultimately improved. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver and Gold Requirement(s) Silver level: Implement a management system that supports achievement of the human rights policy commitments within company operations. Gold level: Implement a responsible sourcing management system that supports achievement of the human rights policy commitments within the product’s supply chain. ---- For the Silver level, the management system must include the following elements: [...] 4. Education for staff with social-related duties on human rights principles. [...]
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Bildung von Arbeitnehmendenvertretungen, wenn die Vereinigungsfreiheit gesetzlich eingeschränkt ist?
-
Kinderarbeit
-
Fordert der Standard die Verifizierung und die Dokumentierung des Alters von (jungen) Arbeitnehmern?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities, measure performance against the human rights policy and confirm the completion of corrective actions associated with issues of high concern including child labor, forced labor, corruption/bribery, and immediate threats to life and safety. For any other poor performance issues, plan corrective actions and, at recertification, demonstrate progress on addressing the issues. Silver level: Request data measuring performance against the human rights policy from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. Gold level: For components and raw materials associated with high risk of child labor, forced labor, or support of conflict, specify or certify to a C2CPII-recognized certification (if available) or equivalent that includes performance requirements aligned with the human rights policy. Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance [...] Required Documentation Bronze Level [...] *The following evidence is required per issue of high concern (Section 8.3 Monitoring & Verification #2a-g): a. Child labour: Written copy of its age verification procedures; a description of training procedures for staff responsible for hiring; a review of randomly selected employee files to verify age was appropriately verified with a government issued ID. For final manufacturing stage facilities with up to 100 workers, at least 20% of files must be checked. For facilities with more than 100 workers, at least 20 files must be checked. Applicants in low-risk locations may conduct this review themselves and submit a summary of the methods and results, including indication of how many files were reviewed, the company locations that they represent, percentage of employees this represents, and if any issues were identified. Employee files are not required to be submitted.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Fordert der Standard die Unterstützung von ehemaligen Kinderarbeitern?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Referenzdokumente:
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für den besonderen Umgang mit jungen Arbeitnehmern?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Referenzdokumente:
-
Fordert der Standard die Verifizierung und die Dokumentierung des Alters von (jungen) Arbeitnehmern?
-
Löhne und Zuschüsse
-
Fordert der Standard die Zahlung von Löhnen, die für die grundlegenden Bedürfnisse des Arbeitnehmers und dessen Familie ausreichen (existenzsichernde Löhne)?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: [...] i. Aspirations for the provision of a living wage that covers the necessities for life as defined in its local context (e.g., food, water, housing, health care, education, clothing, transportation, child care, discretionary income), 8.11 Fostering a Culture of Social Fairness Intended Outcome(s) Socially fair business practices in its governance and management approach are applied by the applicant company. This is reflected by a diverse, inclusive, and engaged workforce and through training, remuneration, and payment of a living wage. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Platinum Requirement(s) Foster a diverse, inclusive, and engaged work environment in which social fairness operates as a core part of recruitment, training, remuneration, performance evaluation, and incentive structures. ---- The following are required: [...] 10. Employees must be paid a living wage. This is defined as being paid sufficiently for a standard workweek (i.e., not including overtime) to afford a decent standard of living for their families, inclusive of: food, water, housing, education, health care, transportation, clothing, and other essential needs including savings for unexpected events and some disposable income.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Fordert der Standard die Zahlung von gesetzlichen Mindestlöhnen und Sozialleistungen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: [...] h. Provision of the legal minimum wage and all legally mandated benefits including employer contributions for social security benefits and services, 8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold [...] h. Legal minimum wage and all benefits including employer contributions for social security benefits and services: • Written policies and procedures regarding wages are to be paid at least at minimum wage or industry wage as agreed with a collective bargaining agreement, whichever is higher.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Verlangt der Standard die Gewährung von Sozialleistungen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. The policy must: 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): h. Provision of the legal minimum wage and all legally mandated benefits including employer contributions for social security benefits and services, 8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Required Documentation Bronze Level *The following evidence is required for each policy element (Section 8.1 Human Rights Policy #2a-j) to demonstrate that performance has been measured for all final manufacturing stage facilities. [...] h. Legal minimum wage and all benefits including employer contributions for social security benefits and services:• Policies and procedures that commit the applicant to provide all legally mandated benefits to eligible workers, including all legally mandated maternity leave benefits and protections, legally mandated breaks, and that aim to ensure employees are paid correctly for all legally required paid time off. • Documentation demonstrating that all legally required payroll documents, journals and reports are provided, complete, accurate and up to date. These records should be maintained by employer for at least 12 months, or longer if required by law. They should include correct and accurately calculated legal withholds in employee pay records, such as taxes, social security, pension, or healthcare from employee wages as required by law.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Fordert der Standard die Vergütung von Überstunden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Ja (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Ja, und Überstunden werden mit einem Satz von mindestens 125 % des regulären Einkommens vergütet (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of human rights risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: • Assess human rights risks and identify opportunities for improvement for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities, and tier 1 suppliers. (Note: Tier 1 suppliers are defined as suppliers to the final manufacturing stage, including in cases where the applicant is using contract manufacturing.) • Demonstrate ongoing efforts to improve visibility and assess risks within the certified product’s supply chain (i.e., beyond tier 1). Gold level: Assess human rights risks and identify opportunities for improvement associated with the product’s components and raw materials (regardless of supply chain tier). Further Explanation [...] Additional Guidance: Obtaining a Deeper Understanding of Human Rights Issues Most human rights issues are complex and require deeper understanding, as outlined in the ILO Core Conventions or other explanatory resources provided in this User Guidance. Companies looking to deepen their knowledge and management approach are encouraged to conduct further research and/or engage with peer companies, respected industry initiatives, and other stakeholders. Some examples include: • Further research into understanding drivers of forced labor – for example, the ILO has defined 11 indicators of forced labor, which include abuse of vulnerability, deception, restriction of movement, isolation, physical and sexual violence, intimidation and threats, retention of identity documents, withholding of wages, debt bondage, abusive working and living conditions, and excessive overtime. See ILO Indicators of Forced Labour. Required Documentation Bronze Level h. Legal minimum wage and all benefits including employer contributions for social security benefits and services: • Policies and procedures regarding that overtime hours are paid at a premium as legally required or by contractual agreement, whichever is higher.
Referenzdokumente:
8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities
-
Fordert der Standard bezahlten Urlaub?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: One out of three (casual / sick / annual leave) (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Zwei der drei folgenden Elemente: Gelegenheitsurlaub, Krankheit oder Jahresurlaub (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of human rights risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: • Assess human rights risks and identify opportunities for improvement for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities, and tier 1 suppliers. (Note: Tier 1 suppliers are defined as suppliers to the final manufacturing stage, including in cases where the applicant is using contract manufacturing.) • Demonstrate ongoing efforts to improve visibility and assess risks within the certified product’s supply chain (i.e., beyond tier 1). Further Explanation [...] • Understanding excessive overtime – Working hours are a fundamental component of safe and humane working conditions. Weekly rest and paid annual leave are expected as a normal part of working agreements, typically required by national and local law, and must be provided to employees as part of their benefits.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die pünktliche und rechtzeitige Zahlung von Löhnen in einer geeigneten Form?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Ja, einige Maßnahmen sind vorhanden (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Ja, alle Maßnahmen sind vorhanden (2 Punkte)
-
Fordert der Standard die Zahlung von Löhnen, die für die grundlegenden Bedürfnisse des Arbeitnehmers und dessen Familie ausreichen (existenzsichernde Löhne)?
-
Gleichstellung der Geschlechter
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien über Verhaltensanweisungen und Prozesse, die die Diskriminierung auf Grund des Geschlechts am Arbeitsplatz verhindern?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: 1. Establish human rights expectations for the applicant company, the supply chain, communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders. 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): a. Elimination of discrimination with respect to employment and occupation including, but not limited to, ethnicity-, race- and gender-based discrimination,
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für das Recht auf Mutterschaftsschutz (gemäß Definition in ILO 183)?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: teilweise erfüllt (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: vollständig erfüllt (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Required Documentation Bronze Level [...] h. Legal minimum wage and all benefits including employer contributions for social security benefits and services: [...] • Policies and procedures that commit the applicant to provide all legally mandated benefits to eligible workers, including all legally mandated maternity leave benefits and protections, legally mandated breaks, and that aim to ensure employees are paid correctly for all legally required paid time off.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien über Verhaltensanweisungen und Prozesse, die die Diskriminierung auf Grund des Geschlechts am Arbeitsplatz verhindern?
-
Freiwillige Arbeit
-
Setzt der Standard voraus, dass die Arbeitnehmende nicht in Schuldknechtschaft gehalten oder gezwungen werden, für einen Arbeitgeber zu arbeiten, um Schulden zu begleichen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities [...] Additional Guidance: Obtaining a Deeper Understanding of Human Rights Issues Most human rights issues are complex and require deeper understanding, as outlined in the ILO Core Conventions or other explanatory resources provided in this User Guidance. Companies looking to deepen their knowledge and management approach are encouraged to conduct further research and/or engage with peer companies, respected industry initiatives, and other stakeholders. Some examples include: • Further research into understanding drivers of forced labor – for example, the ILO has defined 11 indicators of forced labor, which include abuse of vulnerability, deception, restriction of movement, isolation, physical and sexual violence, intimidation and threats, retention of identity documents, withholding of wages, debt bondage, abusive working and living conditions, and excessive overtime. See ILO Indicators of Forced Labour.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Verbietet der Standard die Einbehaltung von Dokumenten der Arbeitnehmenden?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities [...] Additional Guidance: Obtaining a Deeper Understanding of Human Rights Issues Most human rights issues are complex and require deeper understanding, as outlined in the ILO Core Conventions or other explanatory resources provided in this User Guidance. Companies looking to deepen their knowledge and management approach are encouraged to conduct further research and/or engage with peer companies, respected industry initiatives, and other stakeholders. Some examples include: • Further research into understanding drivers of forced labor – for example, the ILO has defined 11 indicators of forced labor, which include abuse of vulnerability, deception, restriction of movement, isolation, physical and sexual violence, intimidation and threats, retention of identity documents, withholding of wages, debt bondage, abusive working and living conditions, and excessive overtime. See ILO Indicators of Forced Labour.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Bewegungsfreiheit der Arbeitnehmer?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities [...] Additional Guidance: Obtaining a Deeper Understanding of Human Rights Issues Most human rights issues are complex and require deeper understanding, as outlined in the ILO Core Conventions or other explanatory resources provided in this User Guidance. Companies looking to deepen their knowledge and management approach are encouraged to conduct further research and/or engage with peer companies, respected industry initiatives, and other stakeholders. Some examples include: • Further research into understanding drivers of forced labor – for example, the ILO has defined 11 indicators of forced labor, which include abuse of vulnerability, deception, restriction of movement, isolation, physical and sexual violence, intimidation and threats, retention of identity documents, withholding of wages, debt bondage, abusive working and living conditions, and excessive overtime. See ILO Indicators of Forced Labour.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Setzt der Standard voraus, dass die Arbeitnehmende nicht in Schuldknechtschaft gehalten oder gezwungen werden, für einen Arbeitgeber zu arbeiten, um Schulden zu begleichen?
-
Nichtdiskriminierung
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Nichtdiskriminierung von Menschen mit Behinderungen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities, measure performance against the human rights policy and confirm the completion of corrective actions associated with issues of high concern including child labor, forced labor, corruption/bribery, and immediate threats to life and safety. For any other poor performance issues, plan corrective actions and, at recertification, demonstrate progress on addressing the issues. Silver level: Request data measuring performance against the human rights policy from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. Gold level: For components and raw materials associated with high risk of child labor, forced labor, or support of conflict, specify or certify to a C2CPII-recognized certification (if available) or equivalent that includes performance requirements aligned with the human rights policy Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance [...] Required Documentation Bronze Level *The following evidence is required for each policy element (Section 8.1 Human Rights Policy #2a-j) to demonstrate that performance has been measured for all final manufacturing stage facilities. [...] a. Discrimination • Written policies and procedures that document anti-discrimination commitment, regardless of gender, race, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, nationality, marital status, political opinion, social group, ethnic origin or medical status. This should include statements that characteristics of an individual shall not be the basis of decisions regarding any employment decision for hiring, job assignment, bonus, allowance, compensation, and discipline, and that these decisions shall be based solely on and discipline shall be made solely based on education, training, and demonstrated skills or abilities.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Nichtdiskriminierung von Menschen mit Behinderungen?
-
Arbeitszeiten
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien für Arbeitszeiten, Ruhetage oder Überstunden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Verpflichtung zur Aufnahme von Kriterien für Arbeitszeiten, Ruhetage oder Überstunden/freiwillige Mehrarbeit, die zumindest den nationalen Rechtsvorschriften oder branchenspezifischen Mindeststandards entsprechen (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Die Standardanforderungen entsprechen den Anforderungen von ILO 1 (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of human rights risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: • Assess human rights risks and identify opportunities for improvement for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities, and tier 1 suppliers. (Note: Tier 1 suppliers are defined as suppliers to the final manufacturing stage, including in cases where the applicant is using contract manufacturing.) • Demonstrate ongoing efforts to improve visibility and assess risks within the certified product’s supply chain (i.e., beyond tier 1). Gold level: Assess human rights risks and identify opportunities for improvement associated with the product’s components and raw materials (regardless of supply chain tier). Further Explanation [...] Additional Guidance: Obtaining a Deeper Understanding of Human Rights Issues Most human rights issues are complex and require deeper understanding, as outlined in the ILO Core Conventions or other explanatory resources provided in this User Guidance. Companies looking to deepen their knowledge and management approach are encouraged to conduct further research and/or engage with peer companies, respected industry initiatives, and other stakeholders. Some examples include: Understanding excessive overtime – Working hours are a fundamental component of safe and humane working conditions. Weekly rest and paid annual leave are expected as a normal part of working agreements, typically required by national and local law, and must be provided to employees as part of their benefits. The first ever ILO Convention (CO1) in 1919 focused on working hours, stipulating a maximum of 48 hours per working week (typically 8 hours per day, for 6 days). While this convention was initially written for industry, ILO Convention 30 makes it clear the expectation applies to Commerce and Office environments as well. ILO Convention 14 stipulates workers are entitled to at least one rest day – which is defined as a continuous period of at least 24 hours each week. Overtime is the number of hours worked beyond the maximum allowed by week (8 hours per day), or 48 hours per week. National laws can vary from international standards. Peak production periods also show that many suppliers do not adhere to these expectations on a continuous basis.
Referenzdokumente:
8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien für Arbeitszeiten, Ruhetage oder Überstunden?
-
Geltungsbereich der Arbeitnehmerrechte
-
Gelten die in dem Standard festgelegten Arbeitnehmerrechte und -leistungen für alle Arten von Arbeit?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Gelten die Arbeitnehmerrechte und -leistungen des Standards auch für Arbeitnehmer von Subunternehmen oder im Unterauftrag?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien für die Erstellung von Arbeitsverträgen, die den nationalen gesetzlichen Anforderungen entsprechen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance [...] Required Documentation Bronze Level *The following evidence is required per issue of high concern (Section 8.3 Monitoring & Verification #2a-g): b. Forced or compulsory labor: Sample of employee contracts to show they include all legally required employment terms
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien für Verträge, die in einer für den Arbeitnehmenden verständlichen Sprache verfasst werden?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Verlangt der Standard die Einhaltung aller ILO-Kernarbeitsnormen für die verschiedenen Lieferanten entlang der Lieferkette?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Wichtigste Tier-1-Lieferanten (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Alle Tier-1-Lieferanten (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities, measure performance against the human rights policy and confirm the completion of corrective actions associated with issues of high concern including child labor, forced labor, corruption/bribery, and immediate threats to life and safety. For any other poor performance issues, plan corrective actions and, at recertification, demonstrate progress on addressing the issues. Silver level: Request data measuring performance against the human rights policy from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. Gold level: For components and raw materials associated with high risk of child labor, forced labor, or support of conflict, specify or certify to a C2CPII-recognized certification (if available) or equivalent that includes performance requirements aligned with the human rights policy. ---- For the Bronze level: 1. Performance data must be generated and verified by a qualified party. 2. For de facto high-risk locations (defined in Section 8.2), performance data must be generated every 1.5 ± 0.5 years. For low-risk locations, performance data must be generated every three years (i.e., for the initial certification and at each subsequent recertification). 3. If identified, the following issues of high concern must be resolved prior to certification or recertification: a. Child labor, b. Forced labor, c. Corruption/bribery, d. Unauthorized subcontracting, e. Missing or deficient permits (i.e., business license, building permit, and environmental permit(s) if required by local regulations), f. Any immediate threat to life or safety (e.g., poor fire safety, structural safety hazard), and g. Denial of access to the facility, workers, or files. Silver level: Request data measuring performance against the human rights policy from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. --- For the Silver level: 1. Social audit performance data must be requested from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers providing components and materials that are subject to review (as defined in Material Health Section 4.3), including all de facto high-risk suppliers (as defined in Section 8.2). 2. If data are outdated or not available, the applicant must arrange for a social audit to be conducted. 3. Audits must be performed by qualified personnel with a social audit credential and no conflicts of interest related to the supplier. 4. Data must be generated within the past 24 months. 5. If identified, the following issues of high concern must be resolved prior to certification or recertification: a. Child labor, b. Forced labor, c. Corruption/bribery, d. Unauthorized subcontracting, e. Missing or deficient permits (i.e., business license, building permit, and environmental permit(s) if required by local regulations), f. Any immediate threat to life or safety (e.g., poor fire safety, structural safety hazard), and g. Denial of access to the facility, workers, or files. 6. Corrective actions must be planned or ongoing for any other poor performance issues identified. At recertification, the applicant must demonstrate progress on: a. Encouraging suppliers to complete corrective actions, b. Tracking whether timelines are adhered to, and c. Taking steps to suspend or terminate relationships with suppliers that fail to make progress on remediation. 7. At recertification, progress must be demonstrated on requesting social audit data from additional high-risk suppliers, if any, identified through the supplier risk assessment. For suppliers that continually fail to provide data, the applicant must take remedial actions (i.e., steps to suspend or terminate the relationship) after a maximum of two years.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Gelten die in dem Standard festgelegten Arbeitnehmerrechte und -leistungen für alle Arten von Arbeit?
-
Sonstige Arbeitnehmerrechte
-
Gesundheit und Sicherheit
-
Gesundheit der Beschäftigten
-
Verbietet der Standard die Belästigung oder Misshandlung von Arbeitnehmenden?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: 1. Establish human rights expectations for the applicant company, the supply chain, communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders. 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] b. Elimination of harassment and abuse, 8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities, measure performance against the human rights policy and confirm the completion of corrective actions associated with issues of high concern including child labor, forced labor, corruption/bribery, and immediate threats to life and safety. For any other poor performance issues, plan corrective actions and, at recertification, demonstrate progress on addressing the issues. Silver level: Request data measuring performance against the human rights policy from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. Gold level: For components and raw materials associated with high risk of child labor, forced labor, or support of conflict, specify or certify to a C2CPII-recognized certification (if available) or equivalent that includes performance requirements aligned with the human rights policy. Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance Required Documentation Bronze Level [...] b. Harassment and abuse: • Written policies and procedures that document the applicant has committed to ensuring its workplace or any workplaces associated with the product cycle is free of sexual harassment, and that sexual harassment is not tolerated. Definitions of harassment and abuse include: (1) Any form of – or threat of – physical violence, including slaps, pushes or other forms of physical contact as a means to maintain labor discipline is not utilized. (2) Any form of verbal violence, including screaming, yelling, or the use of threatening, demeaning, or insulting language, as a means to maintain labor discipline is not utilized.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Anforderungen hinsichtlich der Bedingungen am Arbeitsplatz?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: At least four requirements on proper workplace environment (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Alle Anforderungen an eine angemessene Arbeitsplatzumgebung (2 Punkte)
-
Fordert der Standard Richtlinien und Abläufe, mit denen die Gesundheit und Sicherheit am Arbeitsplatz sichergestellt wird?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: [...] 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] g. Safe and healthy work, including: i. Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), ii. Emergency preparation and response, iii. Hazardous materials handling procedures, iv. Management systems that address health and safety risks, and v. Appropriate building construction, electrical, and fire safety.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien für den Zugang zur medizinischen Grundversorgung der Arbeitnehmenden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Nur Behandlung von akuten arbeitsbedingten Unfällen / Erkrankungen (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Arbeitsunfälle plus Präventionsmaßnahmen (2 Punkte)
-
Sieht der Standard Entschädigungszahlungen/Kostenübernahme bei Arbeitsunfällen und Verletzungen vor?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: teilweise Kostendeckung (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: volle Kostendeckung (2 Punkte)
-
Fordert der Standard den Zugang der Arbeitnehmer zu sauberem Trinkwasser?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.4 Providing Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Intended Outcome(s) Access to drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene is treated as a basic requirement at the facilities where the product is manufactured. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Provide potable drinking water, adequate sanitation, and hygiene to all workers at all final manufacturing stage facilities.
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Fordert der Standard den Zugang zu sauberen und verbesserten Sanitäreinrichtungen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.4 Providing Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Intended Outcome(s) Access to drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene is treated as a basic requirement at the facilities where the product is manufactured. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Provide potable drinking water, adequate sanitation, and hygiene to all workers at all final manufacturing stage facilities. ---- The following conditions must be met: 1. Potable water must be dispensed using a clean and accessible method. 2. An adequate number of toilets per employee must be provided as required by local regulations or international guidelines if local regulations do not exist. The applicant must ensure that sewered and/or portable toilets: a. Provide privacy at all times (i.e., may be locked from the inside). b. Are separate for each gender. Alternatively, toilet facilities will not be occupied by more than one employee at a time, can be locked from the inside, and contain at least one toilet. c. If portable toilets are provided, they must be vented and equipped with lighting. d. Are accessible to all employees including disabled people and people with reduced mobility wherever current employees require such accommodations. 3. Handwashing facilities must be located at or adjacent to each toilet facility and must be equipped with one of the following: a. Running water and soap. b. Waterless skin-cleansing agents capable of disinfecting the skin or neutralizing the contaminants to which the employee may be exposed. 4. A sanitary method of drying hands after washing must be provided. 5. The applicant must establish and implement a maintenance and cleaning schedule with the goal of ensuring that each toilet and handwashing area is maintained in a clean, sanitary, and serviceable condition (including provision of toilet paper or other hygienic option). 6. Reasonable access to drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities must be provided (i.e., either freely accessible at any time as needed by employees or, at a minimum, readily available upon request).
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Um dieses Kriterium zu erfüllen, muss der Standard eine systematische Schulung der Arbeitnehmer*innen in Fragen der Gesundheit und Sicherheit vorschreiben.
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Systematisches Training (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance [...] Required Documentation Bronze Level [...] *The following evidence is required for each policy element (Section 8.1 Human Rights Policy #2a-j) to demonstrate that performance has been measured for all final manufacturing stage facilities. [...] g. Safe and healthy work: Documentation of compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing the work environment, including the following. Provide this information for each final manufacturing stage facility separately. [...] ii. Emergency preparedness and response: Copies of past health and safety reports, preferably conducted by an internal audit or third-party audit firm, to identify any type of health and safety violations. This must include evidence of/that: [...] • Evacuation drills are conducted regularly, at least once per year or more often where required by law. iii. Hazardous materials handling procedures: Copies of past health and safety reports, preferably conducted by an internal audit or third-party audit firm, to identify any type of health and safety violations. This must include evidence of/that: [...] • Employees who are involved in handling, clean-up and disposal of chemicals and hazardous substances received regular training on emergency response plans and actions (with training records maintained). [...] iv. Management systems that address health and safety risks: A valid ISO 45001 certificate, or copies of past health and safety reports, preferably conducted by an internal audit or third-party audit firm, to identify any type of health and safety violations. This must include evidence of/that: [...] • Appropriate training is provided for managers on how to implement the health and safety management system.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Verlangt der Standard sichere und angemessene Unterkünfte für alle Arbeitnehmer*innen?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Verbietet der Standard die Belästigung oder Misshandlung von Arbeitnehmenden?
-
Gebäude- und Brandsicherheit
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Gebäudesicherheit?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: [...] 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] g. Safe and healthy work, including: i. Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), ii. Emergency preparation and response, iii. Hazardous materials handling procedures, iv. Management systems that address health and safety risks, and v. Appropriate building construction, electrical, and fire safety.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für den Brandschutz?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: [...] 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] g. Safe and healthy work, including: i. Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), ii. Emergency preparation and response, iii. Hazardous materials handling procedures, iv. Management systems that address health and safety risks, and v. Appropriate building construction, electrical, and fire safety. Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance [...] Required Documentation Bronze Level [...] g. Safe and healthy work: Documentation of compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing the work environment, including the following. Provide this information for each final manufacturing stage facility separately. [...] ii. Emergency preparedness and response: Copies of past health and safety reports, preferably conducted by an internal audit or third-party audit firm, to identify any type of health and safety violations. This must include evidence of/that: • Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing ‘Emergency Preparedness’. Note: A signed statement of compliance on company letterhead, or a signature on the Monitor and Verify Performance form, is accepted as evidence for low-risk sites. • There are sufficient numbers of emergency exits at the workplace (production floors, office areas, warehouse, etc.). • Emergency exits are clearly marked with illuminated exit signs. • Emergency exits are accessible and free from obstruction during working hours (including overtime). • Emergency exits are unlocked during working hours (including overtime). • Fire escape and main exits are discharged directly to the exterior of building. • Fire and emergency evacuation plans are prominently posted on every floor and work area as well as near exits and stairways. • Aisles, stairs and passageways are kept clear at all times. • Evacuation drills are conducted regularly, at least once per year or more often where required by law
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Kriterien zur Evakuierungssicherheit und zum Notfallmanagementplan?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Es bestehen Sicherheitsanforderungen für Notfälle und Evakuierungen (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: An emergency management plan exists (1 Punkt)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.1 Human Rights Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant is formally committed to respecting and upholding human rights as defined by international standards. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to respect human rights, as enshrined in municipal law and internationally recognized human rights standards, through company policy. ---- The policy must: 2. Include the company’s commitment to support the following (Note: These are the expectations that must be established and are referred to as “required policy elements” in other sections of the standard): [...] g. Safe and healthy work, including: i. Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), ii. Emergency preparation and response, iii. Hazardous materials handling procedures, iv. Management systems that address health and safety risks, and v. Appropriate building construction, electrical, and fire safety. 8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities, measure performance against the human rights policy and confirm the completion of corrective actions associated with issues of high concern including child labor, forced labor, corruption/bribery, and immediate threats to life and safety. For any other poor performance issues, plan corrective actions and, at recertification, demonstrate progress on addressing the issues. Silver level: Request data measuring performance against the human rights policy from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. Gold level: For components and raw materials associated with high risk of child labor, forced labor, or support of conflict, specify or certify to a C2CPII-recognized certification (if available) or equivalent that includes performance requirements aligned with the human rights policy. Cradle to Cradle Certified® Product Standard, Version 4.1 User Guidance 8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Required Documentation Bronze Level *The following evidence is required for each policy element (Section 8.1 Human Rights Policy #2a-j) to demonstrate that performance has been measured for all final manufacturing stage facilities. g. Safe and healthy work: Documentation of compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing the work environment, including the following. Provide this information for each final manufacturing stage facility separately. [...] ii. Emergency preparedness and response: Copies of past health and safety reports, preferably conducted by an internal audit or third-party audit firm, to identify any type of health and safety violations. This must include evidence of/that: [...] • Fire and emergency evacuation plans are prominently posted on every floor and work area as well as near exits and stairways.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Gebäudesicherheit?
-
Gesundheit der Beschäftigten
-
ILO Kernarbeitsnormen
-
Ethisches Wirtschaften
-
Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung und faire Geschäftspraktiken
-
Wirtschaftliche Nachhaltigkeit
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für Aus- und Weiterbildungsangebote für Arbeitnehmer?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die wirtschaftliche Leistungsfähigkeit des Unternehmens?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für Managementpläne zur kontinuierlichen Verbesserung?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.5 Demonstrating Commitment Intended Outcome(s) A culture of social fairness that prioritizes human rights and the application of responsible business practices to all stakeholders is established, promoted, and improved by company leadership. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Demonstrate commitment and support for establishing and maintaining a culture whereby employees and business partners are able to achieve high levels of social performance. Further Explanation [...] Demonstrating Commitment Communicating (Requirement #1): For the Bronze level, communication of the company’s social aspirations, values, and strategy may be either internal or external. This may include, for example, sustainability reports and/or signed policy documents. See Required Documentation section for additional examples. Defining a Position to Actively Lead on Human Rights (Requirement #2): The position often has responsibility for the human rights management plan, internal and/or external progress reporting on implementation efforts, and/or KPIs to measure and assess progress. The designated position to lead on human rights may be full time or part time as appropriate and feasible for company size.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Verbesserung der Produktivität?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für Aus- und Weiterbildungsangebote für Arbeitnehmer?
-
Legalität
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Rechtmäßigkeit des Unternehmens?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities, measure performance against the human rights policy and confirm the completion of corrective actions associated with issues of high concern including child labor, forced labor, corruption/bribery, and immediate threats to life and safety. For any other poor performance issues, plan corrective actions and, at recertification, demonstrate progress on addressing the issues. Silver level: Request data measuring performance against the human rights policy from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. Gold level: For components and raw materials associated with high risk of child labor, forced labor, or support of conflict, specify or certify to a C2CPII-recognized certification (if available) or equivalent that includes performance requirements aligned with the human rights policy. ---- [...] Required Documentation [...] *The following evidence is required per issue of high concern (Section 8.3 Monitoring & Verification #2a-g): [...] e. Missing or deficient permits (i.e., business license, building permit, and environmental permit(s) if required by local regulations): All valid permits required by local regulations. If there is a delayed permit due to longer governmental review periods, the applicant must provide documentation verifying it has requested the permit. For final manufacturing stage facilities, provide the required documentation for each facility separately. If building permits are not available, provide evidence of inspection by a qualified third party (e.g., structural engineer). For rented facilities, rental agreements may be provided instead of building permits.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard allgemeine Kriterien für die Einhaltung relevanter lokaler, regionaler und nationaler Gesetze und Bestimmungen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
5.3 Increasing Demand: Incorporating Cycled and/or Renewable Content Intended Outcome(s) Demand for circularly sourced materials is increased as a result of the increased use of cycled or renewable materials in the product, helping to close the loop and advance the circular economy. Negative impacts of virgin material use are also minimized. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum Requirement(s) Bronze level: For select commonly cycled product and material types, incorporate the required percentage of cycled and/or renewable content into the product using an approved method. Alternatively, publicly disclose an explanation of the limitation(s) preventing achievement of the required minimums. Silver level: Incorporate a percentage of cycled and/or renewable content into the product equal to or greater than industry averages and/or consistent with common practice. Develop a plan for increasing the use of post-consumer recycled and/or responsibly sourced renewable content, and demonstrate progress toward achieving the plan at recertification. Alternatively, publicly disclose an explanation of the limitation(s) preventing achievement of the required percentage(s). [...] Approved methods [...] 3. For biological and biologically derived materials associated with extensive evidence of ecosystem destruction due to land conversion and/or poor management practices (e.g., palm oil, wood, peat) to count as renewable, the material must be certified to a C2CPII-recognized responsible sourcing standard, or an alternative equivalent to certification must be in place, that requires: a. Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of the country in which farming or harvesting operations occur. b. Operations that respect land rights and land use rights, and are unlikely to cause displacement of food production. c. Planning, monitoring, management, and continuous impact assessment for the farming and/or harvesting of material. d. Maintenance, conservation, or enhancement of biodiversity in the forest/vegetation or other ecosystem. e. Maintenance or enhancement of the productive function of the forest/vegetation or other ecosystem area and efficient use of harvested materials (e.g., rate of harvest does not exceed rate of regrowth in the long term). f. Maintenance or enhancement of the health and vitality of the forest/vegetation or other ecosystem and its protective systems (soil and water).
Referenzdokumente:
5 // Product Circularity Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Rechtmäßigkeit des Unternehmens?
-
Verantwortungsbewusste Beschaffungspraktiken
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur fairen Preisen oder Preisprämien?
Mögliche Antworten
- Nein (0 Punkte)
- Ja (1 Punkt)
- Nicht anwendbar (0 Punkte)
-
Gelten die Ansprüche und Leistungen des Standards auch für Lieferanten der Produktionsmittel?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
Referenzdokumente:
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Reduzierung des Zeitdrucks für Lieferanten?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für die Produktionsprozesse, die über die Primärproduktion hinausgehen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
3.1 Certification Compliance Assurance Intended Outcome(s) A compliance assurance system is in place to ensure the Cradle to Cradle Certified requirements are met at all times. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) A documented certification compliance assurance system is in place. ---- The certification applicant/holder company must have a documented certification compliance assurance system in place that includes: [...] 3. A method of staying informed about and/or controlling for material changes that may occur in the supply chain. One of the following is required: a. Suppliers must be required to communicate any proposed changes to the manufacturing process or to intentional product inputs that may alter the chemical composition of the product, or other aspects relevant to certification (e.g., recycled content), to the certification holder. When there are multiple supply chain tiers, suppliers must communicate this requirement to their own suppliers. b. All suppliers that provided chemical composition data, or other product-relevant data (e.g., amount of recycled content), for the prior certification must be contacted again prior to renewal and asked to provide updated data or to confirm that no relevant changes were made by them or their (sub-)suppliers. 3.2.1 Environmental Policy Intended Outcome(s) The applicant company has formally committed to protecting the environment through company policy approved at the executive level. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Commit to protecting the environment through company policy. ---- The policy or policies must: 1. Establish expectations for the applicant company, the supply chain, communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders. 3.2.2 Assessing Environmental Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of environmental risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze Requirement(s) Identify environmental risks and opportunities for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities and for the certified product. ---- The risk and opportunity assessment must include: 1. A company-level risk assessment, based on conducting desk research at a minimum, to scope and identify known, likely, and potential environmental risks associated with the applicant company’s own operations, final manufacturing facilities, the product’s supply chain, product use, product cycling and end of use, relevant communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders.
Referenzdokumente:
3 // General Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur fairen Preisen oder Preisprämien?
-
Wirtschaftliche Nachhaltigkeit
-
Korruption und Bestechung
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Prävention von Korruption und Bestechung?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Korruption und Bestechung sind verboten (1 Punkt)
- Advanced (0 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities, measure performance against the human rights policy and confirm the completion of corrective actions associated with issues of high concern including child labor, forced labor, corruption/bribery, and immediate threats to life and safety. For any other poor performance issues, plan corrective actions and, at recertification, demonstrate progress on addressing the issues. Silver level: Request data measuring performance against the human rights policy from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. Gold level: For components and raw materials associated with high risk of child labor, forced labor, or support of conflict, specify or certify to a C2CPII-recognized certification (if available) or equivalent that includes performance requirements aligned with the human rights policy. [...] Required Documentation Bronze Level [...] *The following evidence is required per issue of high concern (Section 8.3 Monitoring & Verification #2a-g): [...] c. Corruption/bribery: Written policies and procedures that document its commitment to the anticorruption and bribery process, including documented consequences for violating the policy. Copies of training content and training schedules to ensure all employees understand the policies and procedures. Existence of whistleblowing channels to support reporting issues.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Durchführung einer sorgfältigen Bewertung der Geschäftspartner, einschl. Tochtergesellschaften und Auftragnehmer?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.2 Assessing Risks and Opportunities Intended Outcome(s) Opportunities for improvement are identified and understood as a result of an assessment of human rights risks. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: • Assess human rights risks and identify opportunities for improvement for the applicant company, including all final manufacturing stage facilities, and tier 1 suppliers. (Note: Tier 1 suppliers are defined as suppliers to the final manufacturing stage, including in cases where the applicant is using contract manufacturing.) • Demonstrate ongoing efforts to improve visibility and assess risks within the certified product’s supply chain (i.e., beyond tier 1). Gold level: Assess human rights risks and identify opportunities for improvement associated with the product’s components and raw materials (regardless of supply chain tier). ---- For the Bronze level, the risk and opportunity assessment must include all rights required to be included in the policy commitment per Section 8.1 (see the “required policy elements”) at a minimum. The assessment must include: 1. A company-level risk assessment based on conducting desk research, at a minimum, to scope and identify: a. Known, likely, and potential human rights risks associated with the applicant company’s own operations, final manufacturing stage facilities, the product’s supply chain, product use, product cycling, relevant communities, potentially affected groups, and other relevant stakeholders. 2. A tier 1 supplier risk assessment based on knowledge of supplier industry/sector and locations to identify high-risk supplier facilities including those in: [...] b. Locations that are reputed to have conflict, corruption, widespread human rights violations, and/or weak governance.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die Schulung von Arbeitnehmern in Führungspositionen zu den Themen Korruption und Bestechung?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.3 Monitor and Verify Performance Intended Outcome(s) Performance on upholding human rights is monitored and verified, ensuring that corrective actions are taken when poor performance is identified and increasing the level of assurance that risks to human rights are addressed. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Bronze, Silver, and Gold Requirement(s) Bronze level: For final manufacturing stage facilities, measure performance against the human rights policy and confirm the completion of corrective actions associated with issues of high concern including child labor, forced labor, corruption/bribery, and immediate threats to life and safety. For any other poor performance issues, plan corrective actions and, at recertification, demonstrate progress on addressing the issues. Silver level: Request data measuring performance against the human rights policy from all high-risk tier 1 suppliers. At recertification, demonstrate continued efforts to obtain performance data and evidence of tracking corrective actions that may be necessary at tier 1 supplier locations. Gold level: For components and raw materials associated with high risk of child labor, forced labor, or support of conflict, specify or certify to a C2CPII-recognized certification (if available) or equivalent that includes performance requirements aligned with the human rights policy. ---- Required Documentation Bronze Level [...] *The following evidence is required per issue of high concern (Section 8.3 Monitoring & Verification #2a-g): [...] c. Corruption/bribery: Written policies and procedures that document its commitment to the anticorruption and bribery process, including documented consequences for violating the policy. Copies of training content and training schedules to ensure all employees understand the policies and procedures. Existence of whistleblowing channels to support reporting issues.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien zur Prävention von Korruption und Bestechung?
-
Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung und faire Geschäftspraktiken
-
Soziale & kulturelle Rechte und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung
-
Entwicklung der lokalen Wirtschaft
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für den bevorzugten Einkauf lokaler Materialien, Waren, Produkte und Dienstleistungen?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für die bevorzugte Anstellung lokaler Arbeitskräfte?
Mögliche Antworten
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für Investitionen in die Entwicklung der Gemeinde, die über die Geschäftstätigkeit hinausgehen?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
7.9 Positive Impact Project Intended Outcome(s) Water and/or soil quality, water quantity, or the health of aquatic and/or soil ecosystems within the catchment(s) where the manufacturer, employees, customers, and/or suppliers are located is improved through initiation or participation in a collaborative project. ApplicableAchievement Level(s) Gold and Platinum Requirement(s) Gold level: Implement a project that will positively impact local and/or product-relevant water or soil issues. Platinum level: Demonstrate the impact of the positive impact project using quantitative metric(s). ---- The project must: 1. Reach beyond the final manufacturing stage facility and into the value chain and/or local community and aim to positively impact aquatic and/or soil ecosystems, local communities, water and/or soil quality and/or water quantity within the catchment(s) where the manufacturer, employees, customers, and/or suppliers are located. 2. Include direct involvement by company employees and/or senior management. 3. Address one or more of the issues identified in the Characterize Local and Product-Relevant Water and Soil Issues requirement (Section 7.1) or otherwise be material to the applicant company. Further Explanation The requirements in this section apply to the applicant company. Selecting a Positive Impact Project Applicants are highly encouraged to select positive impact projects that focus on issues identified in the Characterize Local and Product Relevant Water and Soil Issues requirement (Section 7.1). If the project selected focuses on an issue separate from those identified in Section 7.1 (i.e., otherwise material to the company as permitted in requirement #3), the applicant must provide an explanation of how this issue was chosen and the explanation must demonstrate that the project is relevant to at least one stakeholder group (e.g., employees, local communities, customers, suppliers, other species, or entire ecosystems). Example projects include: • Participation in collective action projects, if any are occurring locally. May include partnering with NGOs (e.g., WWF) focusing on water issues. • Participation in water stewardship industry initiatives (e.g., working to innovate solutions to product relevant water issues such as microfiber pollution for synthetic textiles). • Participating in a local wetland restoration project. • Working with local conservation organization(s) to advocate for increased protection of upstream forest cover (which is relevant to preserving water quality). • Providing drinking water and/or sanitation to the local community when there is lack of access. Actions that occur only once (e.g., a single volunteer engagement) will not receive credit. Once implemented, the project must be ongoing with actions occurring regularly (annually at a minimum). A project that has not yet been implemented (i.e., is only in the planning stage) does not receive credit. The project must go beyond simply making donations unless it is demonstrated that donations occur.
Referenzdokumente:
7 // Water & Soil Stewardship Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien, dass negative Auswirkungen auf den Zugang und die Verfügbarkeit von Ressourcen für anliegende Gemeinden und kleinbäuerliche Betriebe zu verhindern sind (insbes. Wasser und Land)?
Mögliche Antworten
Auszug aus dem Standard:
5.3 Increasing Demand: Incorporating Cycled and/or Renewable Content [...] Approved methods The required percentages may be achieved based on minimum content, average content, rolling average content, and/or via a credit method (i.e., mass balance) approach. Note: Credit method (i.e., mass balance, also referred to as mass balance allocation method) is as defined by ISO 22095. The method(s) employed and percentage(s) achieved must be reported publicly via the Cradle to Cradle Certified® Circularity Data Report (see Cradle to Cradle Certified® Circularity Data Report reference document). For chemical recycling, the technology pathway (e.g., depolymerization or pyrolysis followed by hydrocracking or solvent purification), available alternatives, rationale for selecting chemically recycled material over mechanically recycled, and a quantitative or qualitative description of the known and likely environmental and human health related impacts and trade-offs, must also be reported. For the Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum levels: [...] 3. For biological and biologically derived materials associated with extensive evidence of ecosystem destruction due to land conversion and/or poor management practices (e.g., palm oil, wood, peat) to count as renewable, the material must be certified to a C2CPII-recognized responsible sourcing standard, or an alternative equivalent to certification must be in place, that requires: a. Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of the country in which farming or harvesting operations occur. b. Operations that respect land rights and land use rights, and are unlikely to cause displacement of food production. c. Planning, monitoring, management, and continuous impact assessment for the farming and/or harvesting of material. d. Maintenance, conservation, or enhancement of biodiversity in the forest/vegetation or other ecosystem. e. Maintenance or enhancement of the productive function of the forest/vegetation or other ecosystem area and efficient use of harvested materials (e.g., rate of harvest does not exceed rate of regrowth in the long term). f. Maintenance or enhancement of the health and vitality of the forest/vegetation or other ecosystem and its protective systems (soil and water).
Referenzdokumente:
5 // Product Circularity Requirements
-
Beinhaltet der Standard Kriterien für den bevorzugten Einkauf lokaler Materialien, Waren, Produkte und Dienstleistungen?
-
Rechte der Gemeinde
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für Streitbeilegungsmechanismen für betroffene Gemeinden?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic: Der Standard muss einen Beschwerdemechanismus für betroffene Gemeinden vorsehen. (1 Punkt)
- Advanced: Der Standard sieht einen fairen Ausgleich für die negativen Auswirkungen der Geschäftstätigkeit auf lokale Gemeinden und Einzelpersonen vor. (2 Punkte)
Auszug aus dem Standard:
8.7 Grievance Mechanisms Intended Outcome(s) A mechanism is in place by which employees, customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders may safely report negative effects of business activities and operations and other social fairness concerns to the company in order to obtain redress for those impacts. Applicable Achievement Level(s) Silver and Gold Requirement(s) Silver level: Provide a grievance mechanism that permits company employees and other stakeholders to obtain redress for negative human rights impacts. For any contract final manufacturing stage facilities, request that a grievance mechanism be made available. Gold level: For contract final manufacturing stage facilities, ensure that a grievance mechanism is available that permits employees and other stakeholders to obtain redress for negative human rights impacts.
Referenzdokumente:
8 // Social Fairness Requirements
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen zum Schutz lokaler historischer, archäologischer, kultureller und spiritueller Güter und Stätten?
Mögliche Antworten
- Basic (0 Punkte)
- Advanced: Schützen und den Zugang nicht behindern (1 Punkt)
-
Enthält der Standard Anforderungen für Streitbeilegungsmechanismen für betroffene Gemeinden?
-
Entwicklung der lokalen Wirtschaft